Page 239 - Read Online
P. 239

Missale et al. Hepatoma Res 2018;4:22  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2018.72                                            Page 7 of 15


               Table 1. Adoptive cell transfer and vaccines for HCC immunotherapy
                Therapeutic approach     Target  Phase   Study population    No. of patients        Results       Ref.
                CIK                   NA          II  Post-resection   76 + 74 controls  Improved RFS  [122]
                CIK                   NA          III  Post-resection  100 + 100 controls Improved TTR  [124]
                CIK                   NA          III  Post-resection or RFA or  114 + 112 controls  Improved RFS and OS  [125]
                                                      PEI
                Peptide vaccine       GPC-3       I   Advanced HCC     11           Improved CTL response  [129]
                Peptide vaccine       GPC-3       II  Post-resection or RFA  41     Improved RFS for patients  [130]
                                                                                    with GPC-3 positive
                                                                                    tumors
                DC pulsed HepG2 protein lysate  Tumor antigens  II  Advanced HCC  35  PR 4%, SD 24%   [128]
                DC pulsed AFP, MAGE-1 and GPC-3  Tumor antigens  I/II  Post-resection or RFA or   12  Improved TTP vs. historical  [126]
                                                      PEI or TACE                   results
                Oncolytic virus JX-594  Tumor antigens  II  Advanced HCC  30        Dose realated improved OS [131]
               HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; RFS: recurrence free survival; TTR: time to recurrence; TTP: time to progression; OS: overall survival; RFA:
               radio-frequency ablation; PEI: percutaneous ethanol injection; TACE: transarterial chemo embolization: CTL: cytotoxic T lymphocytes;
               NA: not applicable


               hundreds of millions and finally are infused in the patient. Third generation CARs are constituted of an
               immunoglobulin variable heavy chain (VH), a variable light chain (VL) connected to a transmembrane
               domain by a spacer and the transmembrane domain to 2 costimulatory molecules (e.g., CD27, CD28, 4-1BB,
               OX40) and CD3. This receptor when engaged can activate the effector cytotoxic T-cell, specifically redirected
               to the tumor antigen recognized by the VH and VL chains. As far as HCC, CAR-T have been designed with
               different specificities and phase I and phase I/II clinical trials are recruiting for patients with HCC or HCC
                                                                                            [132]
               and other solid tumors, targeting GPC-3, CEA and Mucin 1, cell surface associated (MUC-1) .
               A different approach that engages T and NK-cells in vivo to direct them against tumor cells is represented by
               bispecific antibodies (BsAb). BsAb against HCC and other solid tumors have been generated with different
               specificities. One arm of antibody binds a tumor antigen [GPC-3, epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM),
               osteopontin, VEGF] and the second can activate cytotoxic T or NK cells binding CD3 or CD16. A phase 1
               dose escalation trial with BsAb specific for GPC-3 and CD3 is ongoing (NCT02748837).


               Another approach to generate tumor-specific immune cells is cloning and TCR transfection of T and NK
               cells that are in vitro expanded and reinfused in the patients. These redirected effector cells, differently from
               CAR-T or BsAb, recognize tumor epitopes in the context of specific HLA-class I molecules, but have advan-
               tage to recognize endogenously processed antigens, that is the case of many known epitopes from tumor as-
               sociated antigens or neo-antigens from somatic mutations of the tumor-cell. In fact, cell therapies based on
               CARs and antibodies can only recognize conformational antigens expressed on the surface of transformed
               cancer cells. Redirect T-cells have been clinically tested in a patient that developed extra-hepatic metastasis
               after liver transplantation for HCC in HBV-related liver disease [133] . The tumor, but not the transplanted liver,
               expressed HBV antigens and autologous T-cells transfected with a TCR specific for HBsAg could expand in
               vivo and determine reduction of HBsAg serum levels.

               Immune checkpoint inhibitors
               The first clinical study on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in HCC has been a phase II clinical trial tar-
               geting CTLA-4 in patients with advanced tumors in HCV chronic liver disease [134] . The study showed partial
               response in 17.6% of patients and a good safety profile. Transaminase flares were observed in some of the
               patients after the first anti-CTLA-4 administrations that however did not require any immunosuppressive
               intervention. Interestingly in this study an enhanced HCV-specific T-cell response associated with signifi-
               cant drop of HCV viremia was observed. Several other studies have started. The main target has been PD-1
               and its ligand PD-L1 and recently FDA has granted accelerated approval for anti-PD-1 in patients that had
               been previously treated with sorafenib, based on the phase I/II Checkmate-040 study (that showed an overall
   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244