Page 37 - Read Online
P. 37

Page 10 of 12       Mathias-Machado et al. Hepatoma Res 2021;7:67  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2021.84

               CONCLUSION
               This article presents promising data regarding the future of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapeutic
               approaches, with a potential benefit for a large number of patients with HCC who present a significant risk
               of recurrence and death after curative-intended treatment. The impact of an effective (neo)adjuvant
               treatment is more relevant in the natural history of HCC than the treatment of disease at later stages, as it
               has the potential to increase cure rates rather than prolong survival in patients with incurable disease.

               Immunotherapy-based therapeutic choices are emerging as a topic of interest. It is important to highlight
               that clinical and molecular risk factors of recurrence are needed to selectively stratify candidates for
               (neo)adjuvant treatment. Furthermore, surrogates of response to systemic treatments in patients with HCC
               are warranted in order to better identify target patient populations who may benefit from these approaches.
               Ongoing trials have the potential to further change the current understanding and practice of resectable
               tumors in patients with HCC in the near future.

               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Substantial contributions to conception and design of the study and performed data analysis, writing and
               interpretation: Mathias-Machado MC
               Substantial contributions to conception and design of the study and performed data analysis, writing and
               interpretation: Fonseca L

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               Both authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2021.


               REFERENCES
               1.       Association for the Study of the Liver. Electronic address: easloffice@easloffice.eu, European Association for the Study of the Liver.
                   EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2018;69:182-236.  DOI
               2.       Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Makuuchi M, et al. Comparison of resection and ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a cohort study based
                   on a Japanese nationwide survey. J Hepatol 2013;58:724-9.  DOI  PubMed
               3.       Heimbach JK, Kulik LM, Finn RS, et al. AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2018;67:358-
                   80.  DOI  PubMed
               4.       Portolani N, Coniglio A, Ghidoni S, et al. Early and late recurrence after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: prognostic and
                   therapeutic implications. Ann Surg 2006;243:229-35.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               5.       Ouyang L, Lee J, Park CK, et al. Whole-genome sequencing of matched primary and metastatic hepatocellular carcinomas. BMC Med
                   Genomics 2014;7:2.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               6.       Choi JH, Kim MJ, Park YK, et al. Mutations acquired by hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence give rise to an aggressive phenotype.
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42