Page 55 - Read Online
P. 55

Page 8 of 12                                    Armstrong et al. Hepatoma Res 2021;7:18  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2020.118

               Table 1. Review of frontline immunotherapy in advanced HCC
                Immunotherapy   Control arm  Mechanism   Trial   ORR  mOS/ mPFS/  Patient   Biomarkers   Trial
                regimen                of action                mo    mo   population  explored    progress
                Atezolizumab +        anti-PD-L1 +  Phase Ib   36%  -  5.6          ctDNA, whole-
                bevacizumab           anti-VEGF  GO30140                            exome molecular
                                               trial                                sequencing, RNA
                                                                                    sequencing, gene
                                                                                    signature, and TMB
                           Atezolizumab anti-PD-L1              -    3.4
                Atezolizumab +        anti-PD-L1 +  Phase III   27.3%, P   6.8 P ≤  Child-Pugh
                bevacizumab           anti-VEGF  IMBrave150 ≤ 0.001  0.001  Class A
                           Sorafenib  TKI               11.9%        4.3
                Lenvatinib +          TKI + anti-  Phase Ib  36%-  22  8.6
                pembrolizumab         PD-1              46%
                Lenvatinib +          TKI + anti-  Phase III   -  -  -    Child-Pugh              Completed
                pembrolizumab         PD-1     LEAP-002                   Class A                 accrual
                           Lenvatinib +   TKI
                           Placebo
                Anlotinib +           TKI + anti-  Phase Ib/II  24%       Child-Pugh              Recruiting
                penpulimab            PD-1                                Class A and
                                                                          B7
                Cabozantinib +        TKI + anti-  Phase III   -  -  -    Child–Pugh              Recruiting
                atezolizumab          PD-L1    Cosmic-312                 Class A
                                               Study
                           Sorafenib  TKI
                Tremelimumab+         anti-CTLA4  Phase I/II  15%         Majority
                durvalumab            + anti-PD-L1                        Child-Pugh
                                                                          Class A
                Tremelimumab+         anti-CTLA4  HIMALAYA  22.7%  18.7   Child-Pugh              Completed
                durvalumab            + anti-PD-L1 study                  Class A                 accrual
                           Sorafenib  TKI
                Nivolumab +           anti-PD-1 +   Phase III             Child-Pugh              Enrolling
                ipilimumab            anti-CTLA4  CheckMate               score 5 or 6
                                               9DW
                           Sorafenib or   TKI
                           lenvatinib

               Table 2. Review of Subsequent-Line Immunotherapy in Advanced HCC
                Immunotherapy   Mechanism of
                regimen         action         Trial        RR    mOS/mo   Patient population  Biomarkers
                Nivolumab    anti-PD-1    Phase I/II CheckMate  15%-20%  16  Child-Pugh Class A   Tissue collected, PD-
                                          040                              or B7           L1 evaluated
                Nivolumab +   anti-PD-1 + anti-  CheckMate 040  31%  23                    Tissue collected, PD-
                ipilimumab   CTLA4                                                         L1 evaluated
                Pembrolizumab  anti-PD-1  Phase II Keynote-224  17.3%      Child-Pugh Class A

               upregulated in responders. High PD-L1 and T effector signature expression may be associated with
               response to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and longer PFS. Conversely, NOTCH activation may be related
               to a lack of treatment response and shorter PFS .
                                                       [82]
               Historically, melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer and bladder cancer have the highest TMB, noted
               as mutations per megabase, and correlate with response to immunotherapy [83,84] . It is hypothesized that
               HCC is immunoresponsive based on its development from chronic inflammation, but TMB has not been
               confirmed as a biomarker of response to immunotherapy. One retrospective study of 1,170 HCC samples
               found that a higher TMB was associated with significantly worse PFS and OS (P < 0.0072 and P < 0.0001,
                          [85]
               respectively) ; further study is however needed. PD-L1 has potential as a biomarker - results from the
               CheckMate 459 trial showed higher clinical response rates to nivolumab if patient tumors expressed PD-L1;
               specifically, a 12% response was observed if patient tumors expressed PD-L1 at a rate of < 1%, whereas a
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60