Page 60 - Read Online
P. 60

Kwee et al. Hepatoma Res 2022;8:32                              Hepatoma Research
               DOI: 10.20517/2394-5079.2022.58



               Editorial                                                                     Open Access



               Immunotherapy biomarkers for HCC: contemporary

               challenges and emerging opportunities


               Sandi Kwee 1,2  , Xin Chen 1
               1
                Cancer Biology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, HI 96817, USA.
               2
                The Queen’s Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, HI 96817, USA.
               Correspondence to: Dr. Sandi Kwee, Cancer Biology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, 701 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI
               96817, USA. E-mail:kwee@hawaii.edu

               How to cite this article: Kwee S, Chen X. Immunotherapy biomarkers for HCC: contemporary challenges and emerging
               opportunities. Hepatoma Res 2022;8:32. https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2022.58

               Received: 10 Aug 2022  Accepted: 24 Aug 2022  Published: 29 Aug 2022

               Academic Editors: Guang-Wen Cao, Giuliano Ramadori  Copy Editor: Haixia Wang  Production Editor: Haixia Wang



               Clinical management of advanced unresectable HCC has indelibly changed with the advent of immune
               checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) antibody therapy. The CheckMate-040 multi-cohort trial first demonstrated the
               effectiveness of an anti-PD1 antibody (nivolumab) in patients with clinically advanced HCC previously
               treated with sorafenib, reporting an approximately 20% overall objective response rate in such patients .
                                                                                                        [1]
                                                                                                    [2]
               Another anti-PD1 agent, pembrolizumab, demonstrated similar response rates in its phase 2 trial , and
               both agents subsequently received accelerated regulatory approval for second-line systemic treatment of
               HCC. The CheckMate-040 trial later showed up to a 32% objective response rate in patients treated with
               nivolumab plus ipilimumab (an antibody targeting CTLA-4), leading to approval of this combination
               regimen for second-line therapy . With regards to first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic
                                           [3]
               and/or unresectable HCC, the IMbrave150 phase 3 randomized trial associated the combination of
               bevacizumab plus atezolizumab (an anti-PD-L1 antibody) with improved overall survival over first-line
               sorafenib, with an objective response rate of 30% (95%CI: 25%-35%) and median duration of response of
                                                                                  [4]
               18.1 months based on a recent extended efficacy and safety analysis of the trial . Although remarkable for
               the setting of advanced HCC, these findings congruously show that most patients eligible to receive ICI
               therapy will not experience an objective benefit and that predictive biomarkers of treatment response will be
               necessary to optimize the risk-benefit ratio of immunotherapy treatment in this setting.










                           © The Author(s) 2022. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing,
                           adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as
               long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and
               indicate if changes were made.

                                                                                             www.hrjournal.net
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64