Page 49 - Read Online
P. 49

Page 2 of 12                                    Armstrong et al. Hepatoma Res 2021;7:18  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2020.118

               as cirrhosis and chronic hepatitis. The most common risk factors include hepatitis B (HBV), hepatitis C
                                                                                                 [3,4]
               (HCV) fatty liver disease such as nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and alcohol consumption .

                                                                                          [5,6]
               In western countries, only about 30% of HCC patients are diagnosed at an early stage . Improvements
               in screening and surveillance techniques and the development of antiviral therapies have led to protection
                                            [7]
               against HCC in high-risk patients . Early detection of HCC offers the best prognosis and overall survival
               (OS) due to the option of curative treatment in the form of resection or liver transplantation [7-10] . Curative
               resection may be offered to patients, no matter the HCC size, as long as liver function is adequate -
               Child-Pugh Class A without portal hypertension and residual liver volume of at least 20% [8,10] . Liver
               transplantation is the preferred treatment choice for patients who fall within the Milan Criteria (single
               lesion of ≤ 5 cm or up to 3 lesions of ≤ 3 cm) [9-13] . For patients who are not diagnosed within the criteria
               for a liver transplant, liver-targeted therapies such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA), transarterial
               chemoembolization (TACE) and Y90 radioembolization (Y90-RE) are used to control HCC progression
               and prolong the survival rate of patients [14,15] .


               Unfortunately, many patients with HCC are diagnosed at more advanced stages, involving multifocal
               disease, vascular invasion and extrahepatic spread of the cancer. Such cases require systemic therapy, and
               until late 2007, there were no treatment options for these patients. In November 2007, initial results from
                                                                                                        [16]
               2 investigations of sorafenib in the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma - the SHARP
                             [17]
               and Asia-Pacific  trials - both randomized placebo-controlled Phase III trials, resulted in the approval
               of sorafenib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), as the first systemic therapy for advanced unresectable
               HCC. Patients in these trials received either daily sorafenib or placebo in the frontline until radiological
               or symptomatic progression was noted. Both studies reported significantly increased OS of the sorafenib
               compared to the placebo-treated cohort.


               Now, in 2020, nine systemic therapeutic agents are available to treat patients with HCC, including
               sorafenib, lenvatinib, and combinations of bevacizumab plus atezolizumab in the frontline; and regorafenib,
               nivolumab with or without ipilimumab, cabozantinib, ramucirumab and pembrolizumab in the second-line
               setting [16-24] . Although this is a significant improvement compared to a decade ago, there is limited data on
               how to sequence treatments for maximal survival benefit to patients.

               The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors alone or in combination with targeted therapies generates durable
               responses that have reshaped the treatment landscape for HCC. The rationale behind using immunotherapy
               in advanced HCC lies in the knowledge that these tumors arise from a background of chronic inflammation
               and from case reports of spontaneous HCC remission after removing immunosuppressive agents [25-27] . The
               more complex reasoning to utilize immune checkpoint blockade is discussed below. As immunotherapy
               expands treatment options for HCC and numerous other malignancies, biomarkers of response for
               prediction and monitoring purposes are needed. In the current literature, higher response rates to
               immunotherapy have been seen in inflamed tumors with a high degree of cytotoxic T-cell infiltration and
               proinflammatory cytokines, PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability
               and deficient DNA mismatch repair. However, biomarker data for HCC is not yet well established [28-32] .


               RATIONAL BEHIND IMMUNOTHERAPY IN HCC
               The concept of immunotherapy is the mobilization of a patient’s immune system to fight cancer. Hence,
               as malignant cells arise in the body due to epigenetic and genetic factors, continued immune surveillance
                                                                                                       [33]
               recognizes neoantigens on these transformed cells and activates the immune system to clear them .
               However, at the same time, malignant cells develop multiple resistance mechanisms to evade immune
               recognition and destruction. They promote the release of immunosuppressive mediators like transforming
               growth factor-beta (TGF-β) and interleukin 6 (IL-6), which contribute to cancer cell growth, and cytokines
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54