Page 114 - Read Online
P. 114

Best et al. Hepatoma Res 2020;6:62  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2020.56                                              Page 5 of 13

               In order to achieve a sensitivity superior to the combination of US and AFP while preserving high
               specificity in early HCC detection, a large number of studies examined the suitability of different
               biomarkers, such as Glypican-3, AFP-L3, and DCP for HCC surveillance [37-40] . The focus during recent years
               has been on validation of AFP, AFP-L3, and DCP which are already available as certified laboratory tests.

               AVAILABLE HCC-BIOMARKERS AND DIAGNOSTIC MODELS
               AFP and AFP-L3
               The overall AFP, which is usually determined in the clinical routine, consists of the three different isoforms:
               AFP-L1, AFP-L2, and AFP-L3. AFP is a fetal glycoprotein that can be produced later in life when the
                                                                  [41]
               hepatocytes are in the process of malignant transformation . According to various studies, the sensitivity
                                                                                                 [42]
               of AFP in HCC detection is between 39% and 65% and the specificity varies between 76% to 94% .
               AFP-L3 is a AFP variant that binds to the lectin molecule “Lens culinaris agglutinin” and, in contrast to the
               overall AFP, is HCC-specific. While the AFP-L3 fraction is produced exclusively by malignant transformed
               hepatocytes, an AFP-L1 elevation, the non-glycosylated AFP main fraction, can also be caused by viral
               hepatitis and in this scenario is responsible for an incorrectly increased total AFP level [43,44] . With a cut-off
               of 15%, sensitivities between 75%-96.6% and specificities of 90%-92% have been described for AFP-L3 [45,46] .


               Des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin
               Des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP), also known as Protein-Induced-by-Vitamin-K-Absence-
               or-Antagonist-II (PIVKA II), is a precursor of prothrombin and is formed in the context of
               hepatocarcinogenesis due to an impaired vitamin K metabolism. Here, the carboxylation of prothrombin
               is so impaired that the serum concentration of the DCP increases. Sensitivities between 48% and 62% and
               specificities between 81% and 98% have been described for the DCP, making DCP a more specific marker
               than AFP, albeit with lower sensitivity [47-49] .

               Combination of AFP, AFP-L3 and DCP
               Various clinical trials have clearly demonstrated that there were no correlations among the results of AFP,
               AFP-L3, and DCP. Thus, some HCC cases can be positive for only one marker at a time while negative for
               the others. In clinical practice, this means that the combination of the above biomarkers leads to a gradual
               increase in sensitivity.

               Especially when AFP remains the only available marker in clinical routine, the complementary use of
               AFP-L3 and DCP represents an additional diagnostic option. In a retrospective Japanese single-center
               study with 270 AFP-negative HCC patients, it was demonstrated that the majority of patients with positive
                                                            [50]
               AFP-L3 and/or DCP findings were correctly recorded .

               GALAD model
               The aforementioned triple combination of the biomarkers AFP, AFP-L3, and DCP demonstrated superior
               detection of HCC compared to their individual utilization with no significant decrease in specificity in an
               Asian patient cohort [51,52] . For further optimization, a statistically based model called GALAD score was
               developed a few years ago and was extensively validated in several international studies. It is a diagnostic
               algorithm based on rigorous statistical analysis. The formula is calculated on the measured absolute values
               of the three markers instead of defining cut-off levels. Thus, they are considered as continuous variables
               rather than categorical. Gender and age information are also included since older age and male sex
               represent independent HCC risk factors [53,54] . A GALAD point value of -0.63 serves as a cut-off value for
               optimal sensitivity and specificity regardless of the BCLC stage. Using this model in a British cohort, the
               GALAD model achieved an overall AUROC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) of
               0.97 in detection of all BCLC stages, and early stage HCC (BCLC 0/A) was detected with an AUROC of
   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119