Page 110 - Read Online
P. 110

Best et al. Hepatoma Res 2020;6:62                               Hepatoma Research
               DOI: 10.20517/2394-5079.2020.56




               Review                                                                        Open Access


               Evaluation and impact of different biomarkers for
               early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma



               Jan Best , Svenja Sydor , Lars P. Bechmann , Ali Canbay 2
                                                     2
                                    2
                       1
               1 Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University, University Hospital
               Magdeburg, Magdeburg 39120, Germany.
               2 Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum 44892,
               Germany.
               Correspondence to: Dr. Jan Best, Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke
               University, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, Magdeburg 39120, Germany. E-mail: jan.best@med.ovgu.de

               How to cite this article: Best J, Sydor S, Bechmann LP, Canbay A. Evaluation and impact of different biomarkers for early detection
               of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatoma Res 2020;6:62. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2020.56

               Received: 2 Jun 2020    First Decision: 24 Jun 2020    Revised: 7 Jul 2020    Accepted: 9 Jul 2020    Published: 1 Sep 2020
               Academic Editor: Guido Guenther Gerken    Copy Editor: Cai-Hong Wang    Production Editor: Jing Yu



 Received:     First Decision:     Revised:     Accepted:    Published:    Abstract
               Worldwide, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a frequent complication of liver diseases and remains a major cause
 Science Editor:     Copy Editor:     Production Editor: Jing Yu
               of cancer-related mortality. In addition, the prevalence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) as prerequisite
               of hepatocarcinogenesis, even in the absence of cirrhosis, is rising rapidly. The early detection of HCC has been
               crucial in improving the survival outcomes of those patients. However, in the mostly obese NASH population,
               diagnostic sensitivity of ultrasound-based HCC screening approaches is limited. On the other hand, biomarkers for
               HCC show promising potential to improve early detection, providing reproducible, investigator-independent results
               that can be used either alone or integrated with other biomarkers for scoring models. In the past, validation has
               been limited due to a lack of prospective longitudinal cohort studies. At present, large-scale retrospective phase-
               III- biomarker- development gives hope for the availability of biomarker-based screening approaches in the near
               future. This review focuses on the potential impact of biomarkers on surveillance strategies, potentially allowing
               for earlier HCC diagnosis.

               Keywords: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, hepatocellular carcinoma, alpha fetoprotein, AFP-L3, des-gamma-
               carboxy-prothrombin, Gender, Age, GALAD-score, Glypican-3, microbiome








                           © The Author(s) 2020. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use,
                sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long
                as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license,
                and indicate if changes were made.


                                                                                                                                                        www.hrjournal.net
   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115