Page 97 - Read Online
P. 97

Li et al. Hepatoma Res 2020;6:39  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2020.13                                              Page 3 of 7

               Table 1. Studies of stereotactic body radiation therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma
                                  CP class A/ Tumor diameter   Dose/times (Gy/  CR/PR/SD   1/2/3-year LC   1/2/3-year
               Authors      Cases    B/C       or GTV         time)         (%)        (%)        OS (%)
               Cárdenes et al. [6]  17  A6/B11  2-6cm or 8-95 cm 3  36-48/3;36-42/3;40/5  25/56/19  100/N/N  75/60/N
               Yoon et al. [7]  93  A69/B24  1-6 cm      30-60/3-4       15.5/45.7/36.9  94.8/N/92.1  86/N/53.8
               Kimura et al. [9]  65  A56/B9  0.5-5.4 cm 3  48/4 or 60/8  100/100/N  92.3/76/N   N
               Andolino et al. [12]  60  A36/B24  1-6.5 cm  m44/m3;m40/m5  30/40/25  N/90/N      N/67/N
               Takeda et al. [13]  63  A44/B19  1-5 cm   35-40/5         100/95/92   100/87/73   N
               Park et al. [16]  26  A19/B7  1.1-5.7 cm  40-50/10        25/42.9/32.1  N/87.6/N  88.5/67.2/N
               Yuan et al. [17]  22  A10/B10/C2 1.6-9.5 cm  39-54/3-8    50/41/9     92.9/90/67.7  N
               CP: Child-Pugh Class; GTV: gross tumor volume; m: median; N: not applicable; CR: complete response; PR: partial response; SD: stable
               disease; LC: local control; OS: overall survival


               the SBRT group. Another retrospective study compared CyberKnife with surgical resection in the treatment
               of stage I liver cancer; 22 cases were treated with SBRT, and 26 patients achieved R0 resection. There was
               no difference in 3-year survival rate (69.2% vs. 57.1%, P = 0.49). Although the sample size was limited, the
               authors believed that SBRT is effective in the treatment of early stage liver cancer and that the curative effect
               is not inferior to that of surgical resection  [Table 1].
                                                  [17]

               SBRT IN THE TREATMENT OF PORTAL/VENA CAVA TUMOR THROMBUS
               Tumor thrombus is an unavoidable difficulty in the treatment of liver cancer. The tumor thrombus will
               aggravate the occurrence of portal hypertension, ascites, liver failure, intrahepatic and extrahepatic
               dissemination. Choi et al.  analyzed the treatment of advanced liver cancer with portal vein tumor
                                      [18]
               thrombus (PVTT) by SBRT combined with TACE; 9 cases with PVTT treated with TACE at a median dose
               of 36 Gy (30-39 Gy in 3 fractions), and after a median follow-up time of 10.5 months, achieved PVTT CR
               rate of 11.1% (1/9), PR rate of 33.3% (3/9), objective response rate (ORR) of 44.4% (4/9) and median OS of
                                             [18]
               8 months in advanced liver cancer . Xi et al.  applied a median dose of 36 Gy in 6 fractions to treat
                                                        [19]
               primary liver cancer with portal/vena cava tumor thrombus, and 25 of 41 patients had received TACE,
               with a median follow-up of 10 months. The CR, PR, stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD) of tumor
               thrombus were 36.6, 39, 17 and 7%, respectively. The 1-year 0S was 50.3%, and the median OS was 13 months.
               Only one patient had an increased bilirubin level. 

               Wu et al.  reported TACE combined with SBRT with 4-8 Gy per fraction for advanced liver cancer with
                       [20]
               portal/vena cava tumor thrombus. After 4-6 weeks, CR was 8.6%, PR 42.8%, SD 48.6%,, and 1-, 2-, 3-year
               OS were 59.3, 31.6 and 26.6%, respectively, while median survival time was 11 months. Tse et al.  recruited
                                                                                                [21]
               16 cases of primary liver cancer with PVTT, applied an average dose of 36 Gy in 6 fractions, achieved CR
                                                      [22]
               of 6%, PR of 19% and SD of 38%. Bujold et al. reported on 56 patients with PVTT who were treated with
               an average dose of 36 Gy (24-54 Gy in 6 fractions), where the 1- and 2-year OS rates were 44 and 27%,
               respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that venous tumor thrombus was the worst prognostic factor,
               HR = 2.47 (P = 0.01). 


               PREOPERATIVE NEOADJUVANT SBRT FOR HCC
               Patients with HCC (China liver cancer staging, CNLC IIIa) undergo surgical resection, but only a small
               part of the patients have long-term survival, and most of the patients have recurrence or metastasis in
                                                                                                        [23]
               the short term, leading to death. Radiotherapy alone for PVTT is a palliative therapy. Kamiyama et al.
               reported on patients with HCC complicated with tumor thrombus who received preoperative neoadjuvant
               radiotherapy, which was more effective than simple operation. The first branch or main tumor thrombus of
               portal vein was treated with radiotherapy at 30-36 Gy/10-12 times. After radiotherapy, the thrombus and
               intrahepatic lesions were removed simultaneously within 2 weeks. Intervention, radiofrequency, anhydrous
   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102