Page 168 - Read Online
P. 168

Tamai. Hepatoma Res 2018;4:75  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2018.98                                                     Page 5 of 11


               Table 2. Studies with contrast enhanced computed tomography for predicting poorly differentiation, non-single nodular type,
               or microvascular invasion
                Ref.         Modalities       Findings         Prediction Sensitivity Specificity  PPV  NPV  Accuracy
                Nishie et al. [25]  CECT  Washout on portal-venous phase  Poorly diff.  63%  72%  38%  88%  70%
                Nakachi et al. [26]  CECT  Enhancement with non-enhanced area  Poorly diff.  75%  90%  48%  97%  88%
                Nakachi et al. [26]  CECT  Washout on portal-venous phase  Poorly diff.  100%  55%  22%  100%  60%
                Nakachi et al. [26]  CECT  Above combination   Poorly diff.  75%  92%   55%    97%   90%
                Lee et al. [27]  CECT  Intra-tumoral aneurysm  Poorly diff.  18%  99%   93%    77%   78%
                Lee et al. [27]  CECT  Irregular tumor margin  Poorly diff.  74%  44%   32%    82%   52%
                Chou et al. [28]  CECT  Irregular tumor margin (retrospective)  MVI  66%  87%  83%  73%  77%
                Chou et al. [28]  CECT  Irregular tumor margin (prospective)  MVI  82%  87%  91%  77%  84%
                Wu et al. [31]  CECT  Irregular tumor margin   MVI       87%     73%    43%    96%   76%
                Reginelli et al. [30]  CECT  Irregular tumor margin  MVI  66%    94%    84%    86%   85%
                Reginelli et al. [30]  CECT  Incomplete peritumoral capsule  MVI  81%  90%  76%  91%  89%
                Banerjee et al. [33]  CECT  Positivity of radiogemic venous invasion  MVI  76%  94%  83%  91%  89%
                Zhao et al. [34]  CECT  Score model (validation cohort)  MVI  82%  83%  74%    88%   N/A
               PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value; CECT: contrast enhanced computed tomography; MVI: microvascular
               invasion; N/A: not available

               reported that intra-tumoral fat detected by chemical-shift of T1-weighted image indicates lower risk for MVI
               of HCC.


               The recent advances in MRI instrumentation has allowed high quality diffusion weighted images (DWI) to
               be obtained. The correlation between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values on DWI and histologic
               differentiation have been reported [40-44] , suggesting that low ADC values can be a useful predictor of MVI [45-47] .
               However, there was no notable threshold of ADC value for predicting poorly differentiated HCC on meta-
                      [48]
                                  [49]
               analysis . Park et al.  showed that hypervascular HCCs with low ADC value could be interpreted as
               poorly differentiated HCCs, while it was difficult to differentiate between well- and poorly differentiated
                                                                            [50]
               HCCs that are hypovascular. Among all ADC parameters, Moriya et al.  demonstrated that the minimum
               ADC value was the most useful in distinguishing poorly differentiated HCC in 3D analysis of ADC histo-
                                                  [51]
               grams. On the other hand, Ogihara et al.  indicated that contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between the lesion
               and the liver parenchyma on DWI might be more useful than the ADC values for predicting poorly differen-
                                    [52]
               tiated HCCs. Iwasa et al.  also indicated that DWI CNR and the lesion-to-liver relative contrast ratio (RCR)
               on DWI are superior in predicting histologic differentiation than the ADC values, T2-weighted RCR, and
                                                     [53]
               ethoxybenzyl-hepatobiliary RCR. Mori et al.  showed the usefulness of ADC mapping in predicting pre-
               operative malignant potential of HCC. On the basis of their data, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and
               accuracy for predicting poorly differentiated HCC is 93%, 68%, 54%, 96% and 75%, respectively, and those for
               predicting MVI is 89%, 58%, 31%, 96% and 63%, respectively. They suggested that hypointense HCC on ADC
               mapping are characterized by poor histological differentiation and more frequent microscopic portal inva-
                   [53]
                               [54]
               sion . Zhao et al.  showed the usefulness of the combination of the true diffusion coefficient value and an
               irregular shape on hepatobiliary phase for predicting MVI, and the sensitivity and specificity were improved
                                                    [55]
               to 94.4% and 63.6% respectively. Wang et al.  reported that other diffusion parameters, such as mean kur-
               tosis value on diffusion kurtosis imaging, and irregular circumferential enhancement on dynamic MRI were
               independent risk factors for MVI of HCC. The combination of higher mean kurtosis values and irregular
                                                         [55]
               shape are potential predictive biomarkers for MVI .
               Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
               (EOB-MRI) is now commonly used for the diagnosis of HCC. With its use, there have been increasing re-
                                                                                                        [56]
               ports of predicting MVI using dynamic MRI including hepatobiliary phase of EOB-MRI. Chang et al.
               indicated that relatively low arterial enhancement on arterial phase of EOB-MRI and low ADC value were
                                                                [57]
               predictive of worse histological grades of HCC. Kim et al.  suggested focusing on the peritumoral hypoin-
               tensity on hepatobiliary phase of EOB-MRI for predicting MVI. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV
   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173