Page 183 - Read Online
P. 183

Page 4 of 9                             He et al. Chem Synth 2023;3:35  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cs.2023.14

















































                                                a a
                Figure 2. Optimization of the reaction conditions .  Reaction conditions: pre-catalyst (20 mol%), base (1.5 equiv), 1a (0.1 mmol), and 2a
                                      b
                                                c
                                                                          d
                (0.12 mmol) in solvent (1.5 mL).  Isolated yield.  Determined by chiral HPLC analysis.  5Å molecular sieves (10 mg) were used as an
                                                     f
                                    e
                                                                       g
                                                                                                    i
                                                                                           h
                additive at room temperature.  pre-catalyst (10 mol%).  The temperature was 0 °C.  The temperature was 35 °C.  THF = 3 mL.  THF = 1
                mL. Mes = 2,4,6-trimethylphenyl.
               optimization studies revealed that high enantioselectivity with low reaction yield (entry 9, 68% yield, 97% ee)
               was delivered when the reaction was performed with 10 mol% pre-catalyst A. Then, the reaction
               temperature was investigated. When the reaction proceeded at 0 ℃, the yield was dramatically decreased to
               8%, and the enantioselectivity was slightly decreased to 92% [Figure 2] (entry 10). Higher reaction
               temperature did not result in better yield or enantioselectivity [Figure 2] (entry 11). While the changing of
               reactant concentration led to lower yields (entries 12-13). The best reaction condition was established with a
               20 mol% pre-catalyst, 1.5 equiv NaHCO , and 1.0:1.2 reactant ratio at room temperature.
                                                 3
               After establishing the optimized reaction conditions, the scope of the reaction was examined. First, we
               studied variations of the β-ketoester indoles [Scheme 2]. Substrates with electron-releasing and electron-
                                                                                             3
               withdrawing groups on the benzene ring of the indole group of 1,3-dicarbonyl compound (R ) underwent a
               cycloaddition reaction, affording the compounds in moderate to good yields (61%-80% yield) and excellent
               enantioselectivities (3a–3j, 92%-98% ee). It is worth mentioning that the enantioselectivity of the reaction
               can reach 98% when the C5 position of the indol-phenyls is NO . Subsequently, we investigated different N-
                                                                     2
               protecting groups on the indole skeleton, such as Me, PMB, or tert-butyl benzyl. To our great delight, β-
   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188