Page 19 - Read Online
P. 19

Fabbrizi et al. Cancer Drug Resist 2020;3:775-90  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cdr.2020.49                                        Page 781

               Table 1. Promising pathways and targets for radiosensitisation in HNSCC models
                Pathway      Target      Compound          HPV status              Model           Ref.
                Hypoxia     AKT        MK2206        HPV-positive            Cell lines          [50]
                DNA repair  PARP       Veliparib     HPV-negative            Cell lines          [26,27,51]
                                       Veliparib     HPV-positive            Cell lines          [26,27]
                                       Veliparib     HPV-positive            Xenografts          [27]
                                       Olaparib      HPV-negative            Cell lines          [25,52,53]
                                       Olaparib      HPV-positive            Cell lines          [25,54]
                                       Niraparib     HPV-negative and HPV-positive  Cell lines   [55,56]
                            ATR        VE821         HPV-negative            Cell lines          [17,57]
                                       VE821         HPV-positive and HPV-negative  Cell lines, 3D spheroids  [17]
                                       AZD6738       HPV-negative            Cell lines, 3D spheroids  [58,59]
                            ATM        GSK645416A    HPV-negative            Cell lines          [60]
                                       KU-55933      HPV-positive and HPV-negative  Cell lines, 3D spheroids  [17]
                            DNA-Pkcs   KU0060648     HPV-negative            Cell lines          [59]
                                       IC87361       HPV-negative            Cell lines          [61]
                                       NU7441        HPV-positive and HPV-negative  Cell lines, xenografts  [27]
                                       KU-57788      HPV-positive and HPV-negative  Cell lines, 3D spheroids  [17]
                Cell cycle  CHK1       SAAR020106    HPV-negative            Cell lines, xenografts  [62]
                            CHK1       CCT2444747    HPV-negative            Cell lines, xenografts  [63]
                            CHK1       PF0477736     HPV-negative            Cell lines          [64,65]
                            CHK1       PF0477736     HPV-positive            Cell lines          [54,65]
                            CHK1       LY2603618     HPV-positive            Cell lines          [66]
                            CHK1       MK8776        HPV-positive            Cell lines          [66]
                            WEE1       AZD1775       HPV-positive            Cell lines          [66]
                            CDK4/6     Palbocyclib   HPV-negative            Cell lines          [67]
               HNSCC: head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; HPV: human papillomavirus; PARP: poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; ATM: ataxia
               telangiectasia mutated; ATR: ataxia telangiectasia and Rad-3 related; DNA-Pkcs: DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit


               downstream signaling. The mAb cetuximab is an approved chemotherapeutic for use in combination
               with RT in patients with unresectable, locoregionally advanced HNSCC, as it has been proven that its
                                                                  [74]
               administration increases survival compared to RT alone . However, a recent study has shown that
                                                                              [75]
               platinum-based chemoradiotherapy is superior to cetuximab treatments . In fact, it has been observed
               that cetuximab caused tumor growth delay in hypopharyngeal xenografts possibly due to reduced ERK1/2
               phosphorylation. However, laryngeal xenografts did not show any additive effect of cetuximab to RT and
               instead displayed increased proliferation, suggesting cetuximab may be effective only in a subpopulation
               of HNSCC . This is further reflected by the recent failure of two phase III studies examining cetuximab
                         [76]
               in combination with RT in HPV-positive HNSCC [77,78] , which has raised doubts about EGFR targeting in
               HNSCC . Many other mAb treatments of HNSCC have reached phase III of development and initially
                      [79]
                                     [80]
               showed promising results .
               Several TKIs have been investigated in the last 20 years, with gefitinib and erlotinib the first to be tested,
               however more recent data have questioned their use in HNSCC. For example, erlotinib failed to improve
               the radiosensitivity of five HPV-negative HNSCC xenograft models through the observed lack of impact
               on tumour growth . A recent study showed that erlotinib was unable to significantly radiosensitise
                                [81]
               fourteen HPV-negative HNSCC cell lines, although increased radiosensitisation was observed in some cells
               under specific re-plating conditions that overcame the G2 cell cycle arrest caused by EGFR targeting .
                                                                                                       [82]
               Additionally, the recent use of the second generation TKI afatinid in phase III trials in HNSCC gave
               conflicting results [83,84] . The observed differential responses of TKIs in radiosensitising HNSCC has
                                                                                                       [80]
               therefore led to suggestions that their administration is in addition to current therapeutic treatments .
               Nevertheless, results regarding both mAb and TKIs must be considered cautiously, as recent works have
               shown that EGFR overexpression is not common in patients with HNSCC and that in general EGFR
               expression and activity are not well correlated, with many cell lines used in studies not representative of the
               clinical situation [85,86] .
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24