Page 103 - Read Online
P. 103

Gurule et al. Cancer Drug Resist 2018;1:118-25  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cdr.2018.12                                               Page 119

               ONCOGENIC RECEPTOR TYROSINE KINASES AS TARGETS FOR PRECISION MEDICINE
               Malignancies of epithelial tissues account for 80 to 90 percent of all cancer cases, making carcinomas the
                                                   [1]
               most common histological type of cancer . Activating mutations in receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and
               their associated downstream signal pathways function as oncogene drivers in many solid tumor types. Lung
               adenocarcinomas (LUADs) serve as an example of a carcinoma arising from distinct pulmonary epithelial
               cells that harbor many diverse oncogenic RTKs including EGFR, ALK, MET, and ROS1 . Moreover, specific
                                                                                        [2]
               tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are now routinely deployed as first-line therapies in patients with lung
               tumors presenting with these oncogenic RTKs. Examples of these TKIs include gefitinib or osimertinib for
               EGFR, and crizotinib or ceritinib for ALK, ROS1 and MET. Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody against EGFR
               is also used to treat patients with head and neck squamous carcinoma (HNSCC), which often overexpress
                    [3]
               EGFR . Thus, these oncogene targeted agents have proven efficacious for inducing tumor regression as first-
               line therapies, although complete responses are rare and emergence of acquired resistance is universal .
                                                                                                     [4]
               Although TKIs are less toxic than traditional cytotoxic drugs, their use is still associated with various adverse
               effects including skin toxicity, hematological deficiencies, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and headaches being the
               most common side effects. Skin toxicities are very frequent, occurring in 49%-95% of patients treated with
                                                                             [5-7]
               EGFR inhibitors, and 16% of patients treated with ALK/c-MET inhibitors . More acute and often fatal side
               effects such as liver toxicity and forms of interstitial lung disease (ILD) occur at a lower frequency in cancer
               patients treated with the TKIs gefitinib, erlotinib, and crizotinib . ILDs such as pneumonitis and pulmonary
                                                                    [8,9]
               fibrosis occur at frequencies of < 1% and 1.6% respectively with EGFR inhibitors and ALK inhibitors [5,10] .

               The role of EGFR in regulating cellular proliferation, survival, and differentiation during development, tissue
               homeostasis, and carcinogenesis is well established. EGFR is expressed in a variety of normal epithelial
               tissues including skin . Within the epidermis, EGFR is most prominently expressed in proliferating basal
                                  [11]
               and suprabasal keratinocytes. In keratinocytes, EGFR signaling sustains proliferation and migration and
               delays apoptosis in suprabasal keratinocytes that are no longer attached to matrix [12-14] . In addition to normal
               keratinocyte dependent skin homeostasis, EGFR signaling functions in the protective response triggered by
               epithelial cells during wound healing or during defense against microorganisms that cause skin infections.
               EGFR is also highly expressed in alveolar type II epithelial cells in the lung [15,16] . The MET tyrosine kinase
               receptor and its ligand HGF have well characterized functions in tissue remodeling via regulating cellular
               processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, morphogenic differentiation, motility, invasion and angiogenesis.
               MET is expressed on the surface of epithelial cells in the liver, pancreas, prostate, kidney, and lung  and is
                                                                                                   [17]
               essential for both embryonic liver development and liver regeneration after injury [18-20] .



               RECEPTOR TKIS DE-REPRESS INNATE IMMUNE RESPONSES IN TUMOR CELLS AND NORMAL
               EPITHELIAL CELLS
               As previously mentioned, acneiform rash is an established side effect of both small molecule and antibody-based
               inhibitors of EGFR , typically presents within the first two weeks of administration of EGFR inhibitor and is
                               [21]
               a positive predictor of response to therapy. Not only is there a positive correlation between rash and therapeutic
               response of the tumor, but progression free survival and overall survival are also positively correlated with
               presence of these skin toxicities [22-25] . There are three main contributors to EGFR inhibitor induced skin toxicity;
               damage to the epithelial barrier, loss of antimicrobial mechanisms, and extensive release of inflammatory
               chemokines and cytokines. For the purpose of this article, we will focus on TKI mediated chemokine and cytokine
               release. The mechanisms contributing to damage to the integrity of the epithelial barrier and antimicrobial
               defense loss has been previously reviewed . The EGFR inhibitor-induced inflammation is characterized by
                                                  [26]
               robust release of chemokines and cytokines that recruit and activate distinct immune cell populations including
               dendritic cells, macrophages, granulocytes, mast cells and T cells [12,13,27] . Mechanistically, Pastore and colleagues
               have demonstrated that this inflammatory phenotype is largely driven by a type I interferon (IFN) response
   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108