Page 34 - Read Online

Page 12 of 13 Li et al. Ageing Neur Dis 2022;2:13 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/and.2022.13

56. Beckman D, Chakrabarty P, Ott S, et al. A novel tau-based rhesus monkey model of Alzheimer’s pathogenesis. Alzheimers Dement
2021;17:933-45. DOI PubMed PMC
57. Kragh PM, Nielsen AL, Li J, et al. Hemizygous minipigs produced by random gene insertion and handmade cloning express the
Alzheimer’s disease-causing dominant mutation APPsw. Transgenic Res 2009;18:545-58. DOI PubMed
58. Jakobsen JE, Johansen MG, Schmidt M, et al. Generation of minipigs with targeted transgene insertion by recombinase-mediated
cassette exchange (RMCE) and somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). Transgenic Res 2013;22:709-23. DOI PubMed PMC
59. Jakobsen JE, Johansen MG, Schmidt M, et al. Expression of the Alzheimer’s disease mutations AβPP695sw and PSEN1M146I in
double-transgenic göttingen minipigs. J Alzheimers Dis 2016;53:1617-30. DOI PubMed
60. Lee SE, Hyun H, Park MR, et al. Production of transgenic pig as an Alzheimer’s disease model using a multi-cistronic vector system.
PLoS One 2017;12:e0177933. DOI PubMed PMC
61. Raza C, Anjum R, Shakeel NUA. Parkinson’s disease: mechanisms, translational models and management strategies. Life Sci
2019;226:77-90. DOI PubMed
62. Chia SJ, Tan EK, Chao YX. Historical perspective: models of Parkinson’s disease. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21:2464. DOI PubMed PMC
63. Grow DA, McCarrey JR, Navara CS. Advantages of nonhuman primates as preclinical models for evaluating stem cell-based therapies
for Parkinson’s disease. Stem Cell Res 2016;17:352-66. DOI PubMed
64. Kitada T, Pisani A, Porter DR, et al. Impaired dopamine release and synaptic plasticity in the striatum of PINK1-deficient mice. Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:11441-6. DOI PubMed PMC
65. Dawson TM, Ko HS, Dawson VL. Genetic animal models of Parkinson’s disease. Neuron 2010;66:646-61. DOI PubMed PMC
66. Yang W, Liu Y, Tu Z, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated PINK1 deletion leads to neurodegeneration in rhesus monkeys. Cell Res
2019;29:334-6. DOI PubMed PMC
67. Yang W, Guo X, Tu Z, et al. PINK1 kinase dysfunction triggers neurodegeneration in the primate brain without impacting
mitochondrial homeostasis. Protein Cell 2022;13:26-46. DOI PubMed PMC
68. Yao J, Huang J, Hai T, et al. Efficient bi-allelic gene knockout and site-specific knock-in mediated by TALENs in pigs. Sci Rep
2014;4:6926. DOI PubMed PMC
69. Zhou X, Xin J, Fan N, et al. Generation of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene-targeted pigs via somatic cell nuclear transfer. Cell Mol Life
Sci 2015;72:1175-84. DOI PubMed
70. Wang X, Cao C, Huang J, et al. One-step generation of triple gene-targeted pigs using CRISPR/Cas9 system. Sci Rep 2016;6:20620.
DOI PubMed PMC
71. Yuan H, Yu T, Wang L, et al. Efficient base editing by RNA-guided cytidine base editors (CBEs) in pigs. Cell Mol Life Sci
2020;77:719-33. DOI PubMed
72. Komor AC, Kim YB, Packer MS, Zuris JA, Liu DR. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded
DNA cleavage. Nature 2016;533:420-4. DOI PubMed PMC
73. Nishida K, Arazoe T, Yachie N, et al. Targeted nucleotide editing using hybrid prokaryotic and vertebrate adaptive immune systems.
Science 2016;353:aaf8729. DOI PubMed
74. Gaudelli NM, Komor AC, Rees HA, et al. Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature
2017;551:464-71. DOI PubMed PMC
75. Molla KA, Yang Y. CRISPR/Cas-mediated base editing: technical considerations and practical applications. Trends Biotechnol
2019;37:1121-42. DOI PubMed
76. Ryu SM, Koo T, Kim K, et al. Adenine base editing in mouse embryos and an adult mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
Nat Biotechnol 2018;36:536-9. DOI PubMed
77. Lee HK, Willi M, Miller SM, et al. Targeting fidelity of adenine and cytosine base editors in mouse embryos. Nat Commun
2018;9:4804. DOI PubMed PMC
78. Ma Y, Yu L, Zhang X, et al. Highly efficient and precise base editing by engineered dCas9-guide tRNA adenosine deaminase in rats.
Cell Discov 2018;4:39. DOI PubMed PMC
79. Liu Z, Chen M, Chen S, et al. Highly efficient RNA-guided base editing in rabbit. Nat Commun 2018;9:2717. DOI PubMed PMC
80. Zhang X, Li W, Liu C, et al. Alteration of sheep coat color pattern by disruption of ASIP gene via CRISPR Cas9. Sci Rep 2017;7:8149.
DOI PubMed PMC
81. Hua K, Tao X, Yuan F, Wang D, Zhu JK. Precise A·T to G·C base editing in the rice genome. Mol Plant 2018;11:627-30. DOI
PubMed
82. Li C, Zong Y, Wang Y, et al. Expanded base editing in rice and wheat using a Cas9-adenosine deaminase fusion. Genome Biol
2018;19:59. DOI PubMed PMC
83. Li G, Zhou S, Li C, et al. Base pair editing in goat: nonsense codon introgression into FGF5 results in longer hair. FEBS J
2019;286:4675-92. DOI PubMed
84. Zhou S, Cai B, He C, et al. Programmable base editing of the sheep genome revealed no genome-wide off-target mutations. Front
Genet 2019;10:215. DOI PubMed PMC
85. Li Z, Duan X, An X, et al. Efficient RNA-guided base editing for disease modeling in pigs. Cell Discov 2018;4:64. DOI PubMed
PMC
86. Haigh A, Chou JY, O’Driscoll K. Variations in the behavior of pigs during an open field and novel object test. Front Vet Sci
2020;7:607. DOI PubMed PMC