Page 80 - Read Online
P. 80

Page 466                         Wang et al. Art Int Surg. 2025;5:465-75  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ais.2025.03

               control has been demonstrated, with controllers maintaining high accuracy using calibration data collected up to
               246 days prior. In a practical application, a human participant with RPNIs successfully completed a Coffee Making
               Task using four distinct grip patterns, showcasing the system’s functional utility.

               Keywords: Artificial intelligence, prosthesis, robotic prosthesis, artificial neural networks, machine learning, EMG
               signals, deep learning, pattern recognition



               INTRODUCTION
               The sudden loss of an upper limb is devastating, often resulting in functional and vocational impacts on
               affected individuals. In the United States alone, there are 2.3 million individuals living with limb loss, with
               approximately 185,000 new amputations occurring each year . Clinical research has shown that user
                                                                      [1]
               acceptance of prostheses depends mainly on the type of prosthesis, user training, and the control strategy
               employed . There have been rapid advancements in the development of articulated and lifelike prosthetic
                       [2,3]
               limbs over the past two decades, including myoelectric prosthetics, hybrid-assistive-limb systems,
                                                                          [4,5]
               exoskeletons, neural-controlled prosthetics, and robotic prosthetics . Despite all these advancements, a
               seamless interface that allows users to truly mirror natural movement has yet to be developed.


               Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) surgery is a procedure performed to amplify efferent motor
               action potentials from peripheral nerves in the residual limbs of people with limb loss, thereby enhancing
               prosthetic control. RPNI was developed in the Neuromuscular Laboratory at the University of Michigan.
               This surgical procedure involves harvesting a 3 cm × 1.5 cm × 0.5 cm autologous free skeletal muscle graft
               and wrapping it around the terminal end of a peripheral nerve or its individual fascicles . The muscle graft,
                                                                                         [6]
               which can be harvested from the amputation site or a distant location, undergoes a process of degeneration,
               regeneration, and reinnervation . The graft relies on imbibition in the initial stages postoperatively,
                                           [7]
                                                                 [8]
               followed by inosculation and ultimately revascularization . During regeneration, the denervated muscle
               graft is reinnervated by the nerve or fascicle, leading to the formation of functional neuromuscular
               junctions. The peripheral nerve carries relatively low-amplitude efferent motor action potentials, which
               transmit signals through the newly formed neuromuscular junctions to cause RPNI muscle contraction. The
               peripheral nerve signals are then recorded from the RPNI, rather than directly from the peripheral nerve, to
               create a more favorable signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).

               RPNI signals are stable over the long term, which can be attributed to several biological mechanisms. First,
               the reinnervated muscle graft contains functional neuromuscular junctions that remain stable over time,
               enabling consistent generation of compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs). Second, robust
               revascularization of the muscle graft ensures sustained tissue viability and prevents signal degradation over
               time. Together, these features create a biologically stable, self-contained unit that continues to produce
               high-quality, volitional signals for prosthetic control [9,10] . Electrodes implanted within the RPNI then record
               these amplified CMAPs, enabling precise prosthetic control . The RPNI effectively acts as a bioamplifier
                                                                  [11]
               and signal transducer for peripheral nerve signals, improving SNRs and facilitating highly specific and
               reliable prosthetic control.

               While RPNI surgery provides an excellent method for generating control signals, the clinical challenge
               remains complex. For instance, the median nerve controls multiple functions at the same time, including
               index, middle, and ring finger flexion, as well as wrist flexion [12,13] . This results in a multitude of overlapping
               signals that must be accurately interpreted from a single nerve to predict the user’s intended actions. The
               challenge lies in interpreting these signals so that they can be used to control advanced multi-articulated
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85