Page 74 - Read Online

Bala et al. Art Int Surg. 2025;5:476-89 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ais.2025.44 Page 488

Consent for publication
Not applicable.

Copyright
© The Author(s) 2025.

REFERENCES
1. Watson C. Hernia. In: Watson C, Davies J, Editors. Ellis and Calne’s lecture notes in general surgery. Hoboken: John Wiley & Son;
2023. pp. 311-22. DOI
2. Le TN, Afshar Ali M, Gadzhanova S, et al. Hernia repair prevalence by age and gender among the Australian adult population from
2017 to 2021. Critical Public Health. 2024;34:1-11. DOI
3. Mishali M, Sheffer N, Mishali O, Negev M. Understanding variation among medical device reporting sources: a study of the MAUDE
database. Clin Ther. 2025;47:76-81. DOI PubMed
4. Clavel M, Durán F, Eker S, et al. Maude manual (version 3.1). SRI International, 2020. Available from: https://gentoo.uls.co.za/
distfiles/5d/Maude-3.1-manual.pdf [accessed 16 October 2025].
5. Kou Q, Wu M. Unlocking the potential of natural language processing in decoding medical device adverse events. In: Lane M,
Sethumadhavan A, Editors. Collaborative intelligence: how humans and AI are transforming our world. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2024.
pp. 197-211. DOI
6. I. Natural language processing in medical science and healthcare. Medicon Med Sci. 2023:4;1-2. DOI
7. Liao TJ, Crosby L, Cross K, Chen M, Elespuru R. Medical device report analyses from MAUDE: device and patient outcomes,
adverse events, and sex-based differential effects. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2024;149:105591. DOI PubMed
8. Bala I, Malhotra A. Fuzzy classification with comprehensive learning gravitational search algorithm in breast tumor detection. IJRTE.
2019;8:2688-94. DOI
9. Martin SC, Fitzgerald JJ. Tipu Zahed Aziz, MD (November 9, 1956-October 25, 2024). Neuromodulation. 2025;28:371-2. DOI
10. Touvron H, Lavril T, Izacard G, et al. LLaMA: open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv 2023; arXiv:2302.13971.
Available from https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.13971 [accessed 16 October 2025].
11. Bumgardner VK, Larsen MA, Anderson MB, Sayre GG, Fecho K, Pfaff ER. Local large language models for complex structured
medical tasks. arXiv 2023; arXiv:2308.01727. Available from https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.01727 [accessed 16 October 2025].
12. Wang H, Gao C, Dantona C, Hull B, Sun J. DRG-LLaMA : tuning LLaMA model to predict diagnosis-related group for hospitalized
patients. NPJ Digit Med. 2024;7:16. DOI PubMed PMC
13. Zhang R, Han J, Zhou A, et al. LLaMA-Adapter: efficient fine-tuning of large language models with zero-initialized attention. arXiv
2024; arXiv:2303.16199. Available from https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.16199 [accessed 16 October 2025].
14. Frayling E, Lever J, McDonald G. Zero-shot and few-shot generation strategies for artificial clinical records. arXiv 2024; arXiv:2403.
08664. Available from https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.08664 [accessed 16 October 2025].
15. Lewis P, Perez E, Piktus A, et al. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. arXiv 2020; arXiv:2005.11401.
Available from https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.11401 [accessed 16 October 2025].
16. Gao Y, Xiong Y, Gao X, et al. Retrieval-augmented generation for large language models: a survey. arXiv 2023; arXiv:2312.10997.
Available from https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.10997 [accessed 16 October 2025].
17. Salemi A, Zamani H. Evaluating retrieval quality in retrieval-augmented generation. In: SIGIR 2024: Proceedings of the 47th
International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval; 2024 Jul 14-18; Washington DC, USA.
New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2024. pp. 2395-400. DOI
18. Yu H, Guo P, Sano A. Zero-shot ECG diagnosis with large language models and retrieval-augmented generation. In Machine learning
for health (ML4H); 2023 Dec 10; New Orleans, USA. Cambridge: PMLR; 2023. pp. 650-63. Available from https://proceedings.mlr.
press/v225/yu23b.html [accessed 16 October 2025].
19. Thompson WE, Vidmar DM, De Freitas JK, et al. Large language models with retrieval-augmented generation for zero-shot disease
phenotyping. arXiv 2023; arXiv:2312.06457. Available from https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.06457 [accessed 16 October 2025].
20. Mahbub S, Ellington C, Alinejad S, et al. From one to zero: RAG-IM adapts language models for interpretable zero-shot predictions on
clinical tabular data. In: NeurIPS 2024 Third Table Representation Learning Workshop, 2024. Available from https://openreview.net/
forum?id=3OYjWzqqC1 [accessed 16 October 2025].
21. Ke YH, Jin L, Elangovan K, et al. Retrieval augmented generation for 10 large language models and its generalizability in assessing
medical fitness. NPJ Digit Med. 2025;8:187. DOI PubMed PMC
22. Dong X, Zhao D, Meng J, Guo B, Lin H. SyRACT: zero-shot biomedical document-level relation extraction with synergistic RAG and
CoT. Bioinformatics. 2025;41:btaf356. DOI PubMed PMC
23. Mishali M, Sheffer N, Mishali O, Negev M. Evaluation of reporting trends in the MAUDE Database: 1991 to 2022. Digit Health.
2025;11:20552076251314094. DOI PubMed PMC
24. Bala I, Kelly T, Stanford T, Gillam MH, Mitchell L. Machine learning-based analysis of adverse events in mesh implant surgery
reports. Soc Netw Anal Min. 2024;14:1229. DOI