Page 17 - Read Online
P. 17

Dababneh et al. Art Int Surg 2024;4:214-32  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ais.2024.50                                                                                                                                                    Page 222



 Tung et al.   Scaphoid  356  VGG16, VGG19, RN50, RN101, RN152, DN121, DN169,   RN101: 0.950   RN101: 0.889   RN101: 0.889
 [44]
 (2021)  DN201, Inv, ENB0                DN201: 0.910      DN201: 0.944      DN201: 0.861
 Yang et al.   Scaphoid  361  ResNet     0.917             0.735             0.920
 [45]
 (2022)
 Langerhuizen   Scaphoid  300 (scaphoid series)  Open source pretrained CNN (Visual Geometry Group,   0.77  0.84  0.60
 [47]
 et al. (2020)  Oxford, United Kingdom)

 Yoon et al.   Scaphoid  11,838 (PA, scaphoid view)  DCNN based on the EfficientNetB3 architecture  Fracture detection:  0.87  0.92
 [48]
 (2021)                                  0.955
                                         Occult fracture
                                         detection: 0.81

 Raisuddin et al.  Distal radius  4,497 (AP, lat)  DeepWrist  General test:   General test: 0.97   General test: 0.87
 [49]
 (2021)                                  0.990             Occult fractures:   Occult
                                         Occult fractures:   0.60            fractures:0.92
                                         0.84
 Zech et al.   Distal radius  395 (AP)  Faster R-CNN model  0.92  0.88       0.89
 [51]*
 (2023)
 Ilie et al.   Finger, hand, wrist, forearm, elbow,   58,846  Faster R-CNN  0.96  0.91  0.89
 [53]
 (2023)  humerus, shoulder, clavicule
 Watanabe   Distal radius or distal ulna  7,356 (PA, lat)  Inception-ResNet Faster R-CNN  0.918 (PA)   0.957 (PA)   0.825 (PA)
 [54]
 et al. (2019)                           0.933 (lat)       0.967 (lat)       0.864 (lat)
 Orji et al.   Finger  8,170  ComDNet-512 (deep neural network-based hybrid model) 0.894  0.94  0.85
 [55]
 (2022)
 *
 Pediatric studies. ML: Machine learning; AUC: area under the receiver operator characteristic curve; CNN: convolutional neural network; AP: anterior-posterior radiograph projection; lat: lateral radiograph
 projection; AI: artificial intelligence; PA: posterior-anterior radiograph projection; WFD-C: wrist fracture detection-combo; DCNN: deep convolutional neural network; R-CNN: region-based convolutional neural
 network.



 AI as an adjuvant in ultrasound fracture detection

 While X-rays remain the gold standard for diagnosing distal radius fractures, the use of ultrasound (US) in emergency departments (ED) has gained popularity
 due to its accessibility, minimal training requirements, and capacity to assess surrounding soft tissues.



 Zhang et al. were the first to explore the potential of US for fracture detection, aiming to reduce unnecessary radiation exposure for children without

 fractures . In their study, they used a three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS) as a diagnosis tool for patients presenting with wrist tenderness before
 [56]
 undergoing X-rays. The findings demonstrated that 3DUS had a diagnostic accuracy of 96.5% for distal radius fractures, establishing it as a reliable method for

 fracture detection in a pediatric setting. Moreover, the CNN model trained to interpret US images detected all fractures with 100% sensitivity and 87%
 specificity, matching the sensitivity of the pediatric MSK radiologist.
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22