Page 103 - Read Online
P. 103

Martinez et al. Art Int Surg. 2025;5:16-23  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ais.2024.73   Page 20

               spinal surgery to help with preoperative planning and surgical training [45,48] . The approach and positioning
               of pedicle screws, foraminotomies, percutaneous interventions, and biopsies can all be achieved more safely,
                                                            [49]
               with less margin of error, under the guidance of AR . AR also permits spine surgeons to view dissection
                                                                                               [50]
               planes and tumor volumes with microscopic virtual mapping for performing osteotomies . Ma et al.
               describe an ultrasound methodology to superimpose surgical planning in situ by incorporating CT images
                                        [51]
               with 3D anatomic landmarks .
               Spine surgery can be challenging at baseline, as it is not uncommon to lack direct exposure or visualization
               of the intricate, densely organized vessels and nerves along the axial skeleton. By the very nature of the field,
               spino-plastics aims to treat an even more challenging subsect of patients. The distortion of native anatomy
               in complex cases, whether caused by revision surgery or the mass effect of tumor bulk, presents additional
               obstacles to intraoperative identification of neurovasculature. AR can aid surgeons in this difficult task,
               employing visual information from MRI and CT scans to build surgical maps and chart paths around key
               anatomic structures [45,46] . In spino-plastics cases, once the spinal instrumentation and fusion are complete,
               the surgeon may harvest the VBG utilizing the standard arthrodesis instruments that are already on the
               sterile field. If stealth guidance or AR is already being utilized for arthrodesis, it would be wise to consider
               keeping the system available to assist the surgeon in harvesting and ensuring adequate fixation of the VBG.
               Better spatial conceptualization of the instrumentation might reduce any risk of damaging nearby structures
               in the vertebral column or retroperitoneum.

               LOOKING TO THE FUTURE
               Notably, the ultimate boundaries of AI have yet to be uncovered. AI has already contributed to our
                                                                   [23]
               understanding of driver mutations behind spinal cord tumors . This incredible technology will continue to
               improve basic science research and treatment modalities to address the needs of spino-plastic patients from
               many different perspectives. Despite the tremendous promise and exponential rise in these technological
               advancements, there is much work to be done before clinicians may be completely comfortable about
               incorporating this new technology into their workflow. Because ML is a powerful tool that is not fully
               understood, caution must be exercised regarding the input of information to avoid the perpetuation of
               misinformation and social biases. Overall, ML and AI currently lack transparency, which creates a “black
               box” that may be difficult for surgeons to trust when comparing results to well-published algorithms that
               have a more easily understood basis. However, there are methods currently being utilized to validate their
               efficacy in clinical practice. This includes the results of case studies and trials - where technologies such as
               imaging guidance can differentiate tumors from healthy tissue  - comparative studies, and live integration
                                                                    [52]
               with surgical teams  that provide constant feedback to enhance the safety and predictive power of AI
                                [3]
               algorithms. Many metrics were used in these various studies to compare the performance of AI algorithms
               to traditional models, such as the area under the curve, accuracy, and the receiver operating characteristic
               curve. Furthermore, there is an upfront investment of time and resources essential for the development of
               novel algorithms bearing any clinical significance. In other words, there is a significant lag time between
               technological advancements and gaining necessary approvals for clinical application through the proper
               avenues, including national supervisory organizations and individual hospital systems . In this stage of
                                                                                          [53]
               conceptualization, there are limited existing data on AI in spino-plastic surgery and further long-term data
               collection is required.

               Despite the harvest and fixation of VBGs not requiring any additional tools that are traditionally used in
               spinal fusion, the field of spino-plastics is in its nascent stages. Due to resource limitations or surgeon-
               specific comfort levels with working in the spine and retroperitoneum, not all institutions have access to
               plastic surgeons capable of performing this procedure. Developing strategies to implement novel AI
   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108