Page 76 - Read Online
P. 76

Page 4 of 7                                                             Rostagno. Vessel Plus 2020;4:7  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2019.29

               Table 3. Results of study comparing MV repair and replacement in infective endocarditis
                                                        Hospital   Follow-up   Follow-up
                               Repair n (%) vs.   Hospital                            Microbiology   IE
               Retrospective studies                    mortality   mortality   mortality
                                replacement  mortality repair                       repair-replacement recurrence
                                                       replacement  repair  replacement
               El Gabry et al. [19]  35 (NA)   11%        -       23% 10 m  -       Strept 28%      5%
                                                                                    Staph 29%
                                                                                    Other 11%%
                                                                                    Culture 31%
                                                                                    Negative
               Alkhouli et al. [18]  NA (25%)  8.1%       11.3%   -         -       NA              0 %
               Tepsuwan et al. [22]  114 (52%)  -                 9% 1 y    30% 1 y  Strept 51%-50%   -
                                               -                                    Staph 11%-2%
                                                                                    Other 6%-16%
                                                                                    Culture 32%-32%
                                                                                    Negative
               Lee et al. [23]    454 (21.2%)  6.3%       10.8%   19% 4 y   31% 4 y  Strept 60%-48%  -
                                                                                    Staph 30%-40%
                                                                                    Other 10%-12%
               Rostagno et al. [20]    34 (68%)  11%      15%     14.7% 1 y  22% 1 y  Strept 52%-36%   2.9%
                                                                                    Staph 31%-34%
                                                                                    Other 10%-12%
                                                                                    Culture 7%-18%
                                                                                    Negative
               Solari et al. [21]    155 (81%)  11.6%     29.7%   43% 15 y  64% 15 y  Strept 36%-19%   2.4%
                                                                                    Staph 43%-54%
                                                                                    Other 11%-12%
                                                                                    Culture 10%-15%
                                                                                    Negative
               Cuerpo et al. [24]    68 (18.4%)  16%      27%     20% 1 y   30.7% 1 y  Strept 38%-38%   0.1%
                                                                                    Staph 26%-32%
                                                                                    Other 20%-24%
                                                                                    Culture 6%-6%
                                                                                    Negative
               Review/meta-analysis
               Feringa et al. [17]    490 (39%)  2.3%     14.2%   7.8% 3 y  40.5% 3 y  Strept 43%-42%  1.8%
                                                                                    Staph 24%-31%
                                                                                    Other 13%-7%
                                                                                    Culture 20%-20%
                                                                                    Negative
               Harky et al. [25]  2906 (32%)   5%         10%     8.3% 1 y  17.3% 1 y  Strept 43%-33%   2.9%
                                                                                    Staph 33%-35%
                                                                                    Other 13%-14%
                                                                                    Culture 11%-18%
                                                                                    Negative

               y: year; m: months; Strept: Streptococcus species; Staph: Staphylococcus species; NA: not available; IE: infectiive endocarditis; MV: mitral valve

               randomized studies. Available information relies on observational studies often reporting a small number
               of patients. Valve repair has decreased risk of prolonged anticoagulation and to left ventricular geometric
                                                                                          [17]
               changes, which are associated with valve replacement. In a pivotal review by Feringa et al. , 470/1194 (39%)
               patients with MV endocarditis underwent valve repair. In-hospital mortality (2.3% vs. 14.4%) and long-
               term mortality (7.8% vs. 40.5%) were significantly lower after valve repair in comparison with replacement.
               Moreover, after MV repair, the authors reported a significant decrease in the rates of early and late
               reoperation, early and late cerebrovascular events and late recurrent endocarditis.


               In the last decade, the number of patients with IE undergoing MV surgery has increased significantly as
                                                   [18]
               well as the number of mitral valve repair . However, the percentage of repair vs. replacement showed
               high variability in different centers. Overall MV repair is associated with a better outcome in comparison
               to valve replacement both in term of in-hospital and long-term mortality [19-25] . Furthermore, the risk of
               recurrence of endocarditis is significantly lower after MV repair. Finally MV repair was associated with
               shorter length of hospitalization and reduced cost. Results were not significant influenced by the need
   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81