Page 247 - Read Online

Page 4 of 4 Salsano et al. Vessel Plus 2020;4:21 I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2020.12

Performed data acquisition, as well as provided administrative, technical, and material support: Salsano A,
Natali R, Parolari G

Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.

Financial support and sponsorship
None.

Conflicts of interest
All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.

Consent for publication
The individual details used in this manuscript were obtained with the patient’s consent for publication.

Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.

REFERENCES
1. Augoustides JG, Wolfe Y, Walsh EK, Szeto WY. Recent advances in aortic valve disease: Highlights from a bicuspid valve to transcatheter
aortic valve replacement. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2009;23:569-75.
2. Sievers HH, Schmidtke C. A classification system for the bicuspid aortic valve from 304 surgical specimens. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
2007;133:1228-33.
3. Cecconi M, Nistri S, Quarti A, Manfrin M, Colonna PL, et al. Aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. J Cardiovasc Med
(Hagerstown) 2006;7:11-20.
4. Bauer M, Pasic M, Meyer R, Goetze N, Bauer U, et al. Morphometric analysis of aortic media in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid
aortic valve. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:58-62.
5. Michalowska I M, Hryniewiecki T, Kwiatek P, Stoklosa P, Swoboda-Rydz U, et al. Coronary artery variants and anomalies in patients
with bicuspid aortic valve J Thorac Imaging 2016;31:156-62.
6. Loukas M, Patel S, Cesmebasi A, Muresian H, Tubbs RS, et al. The clinical anatomy of the conal artery. Clin Anat 2016;29:371-9.
7. Koenraadt WMC, Bartelings MM, Bokencamp R, Gittenberger-de-Groot AC, DeRuiter MC, et al. Coronary anatomy in children with
bicuspid aortic valves and associated congenital heart. Heart 2018;104:385-93.
8. Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, Bossone E, Di Bartolomeo R, et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic
diseases: document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the
Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2014;35:2873-926.
9. Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, De Bonis M, Hamm C, et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.
Eur Heart J 2017;38:2739-91.
10. DeFaria Yeh D. Coronary artery variants and bicuspid aortic valve disease: gaining insight into genetic underpinnings. Heart
2018;104:363-4.
11. Naito S, Petersen J, Reichenspurner H, Girdauskas E. The impact of coronary anomalies on the outcome in aortic valve surgery:
comparison of bicuspid aortic valve versus tricuspid aortic valve morphotype. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2018;26:617-22.
12. Lee HJ, Kim YJ, Hur J, Nam JE, Kim TH, et al. Coronary artery anomalies: detection on coronary artery calcium scoring scan. AJR Am J
Roentgenol 201;194:W382-7.
13. Sultan I, Konic CM, Bavaria JE. How I teach a valve-sparing root replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;101:422-5.
14. Ong CS, Cameron DE, Jacobs ML. Surgical management of anomalous coronary arteries. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2018;7:604-10.
15. Brothers JA, Frommelt MA, Jaquiss RDB, Myerburg RJ, Fraser CD Jr, et al. Expert consensus guidelines: anomalous aortic origin of a
coronary artery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017;153:1440-57.
16. O’Blenes SB, Feindel CM. Aortic root replacement with anomalous origin of the coronary arteries. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:647-9.
17. Bertin M, Aboukofa M, Laterre PF, Yousif Z. Case report: TAVI in a patient with single coronary artery and bicuspid valve. Case Rep
Cardiol 2020;2020:2569506.
18. Patel PA, Gutsche JT, Vernick WJ, Giri JS, Ghadimi K, et al. The functional aortic annulus in the 3D era: focus on transcatheter aortic
valve replacement for the perioperative echocardiographer. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2015;29:240-5.