Page 233 - Read Online

Van der Merwe et al. Vessel Plus 2019;3:24 I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2019.17 Page 9 of 9

Angiography-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2018;11:e006368.
35. Glineur D, Grau JB, Etienne PY, Benedetto U, Fortier JH, Papadatos S, et al. Impact of preoperative fractional flow reserve on arterial
bypass graft anastomotic function: the IMPAG trial. Eur Heart J 2019. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz329. [Epub ahead of print].
36. Thuesen AL, Riber LP, Veien KT, Christiansen EH, Jensen SE, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiographically-guided coronary
artery bypass grafting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:2732-43.
37. Toth GG, De Bruyne B, Kala P, Ribichini FL, Casselman F, et al. Graft patency after FFR-guided versus angiography-guided coronary
artery bypass grafting. The GRAFFITI trial. EuroIntervention 2019; aa-608 2019. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00463
38. Mulukutla SR, Gleason T, Sharbaugh M, Sultan I, Marroquin OC, et al. Coronary Bypass Versus Percutaneous Revascularization in
Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.02.064. [Epub ahead of print].
39. Norgaard BL, Hjort J, Gaur S, Hansson N, Bøtker HE, et al. Clinical Use of Coronary CTA-Derived FFR for Decision-Making in
Stable CAD. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;10:541-50.
40. Curzen NP, Nolan J, Zaman AG, Nørgaard BL, Rajani R. Does the Routine Availability of CT-Derived FFR Influence Management
of Patients With Stable Chest Pain Compared to CT Angiography Alone?: The FFRCT RIPCORD Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging
2016;9:1188-94.
41. Nørgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S, Seneviratne S, Ko BS, et al. Diagnostic Performance of Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve Derived
From Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:1145-55.
42. Shiode N, Okimoto T, Tamekiyo H, Kawase T, Yamane K, et al. Comparison between the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio and Resting
Distal Coronary Artery Pressure/Aortic Pressure and the Fractional Flow Reserve: The Diagnostic Accuracy Can Be Improved by the
Use of both Indices. Intern Med 2017;56:749-53.
43. Sen S, Escaned J, Malik IS, Mikhail GW, Foale RA, et al. Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of
stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis
Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1392-402.
44. Petraco R, Al-Lamee R, Gotberg M, Sharp A, Hellig F,et al. Real-time use of instantaneous wave-free ratio: results of the ADVISE in-

practice: an international, multicenter evaluation of instantaneous wave-free ratio in clinical practice. Am Heart J 2014;168:739-48.
45. Jeremias A, Maehara A, Généreux P, Asrress KN, Berry C, et al. Multicenter core laboratory comparison of the instantaneous wave-
free ratio and resting Pd/Pa with fractional flow reserve: the RESOLVE study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:1253-61.