Page 214 - Read Online
P. 214

Raja. Vessel Plus 2019;3:23                                                 Vessel Plus
               DOI: 10.20517/2574-1209.2019.05




               Review                                                                        Open Access


               Total arterial coronary grafting: outcomes, concerns
               and controversies



               Shahzad G. Raja

               Department of Cardiac Surgery, Harefield Hospital, Hill End Road, Harefield, Middlesex UB9 6JH, UK.
               Correspondence to: Dr. Shahzad G. Raja, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Harefield Hospital, Hill End Road, Harefield, Middlesex
               UB9 6JH, UK. E-mail: drrajashahzad@hotmail.com

               How to cite this article: Raja SG. Total arterial coronary grafting: outcomes, concerns and controversies. Vessel Plus 2019;3:23.
               http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2019.05

               Received: 27 Mar 2019    First Decision: 22 Apr 2019    Revised: 11 Jun 2019    Accepted: 12 Jun 2019    Published: 11 Jul 2019
               Science Editor: Mario F. L. Gaudino    Copy Editor: Cai-Hong Wang    Production Editor: Jing Yu



               Abstract

               Choice of conduit remains the Achilles heel of coronary artery bypass grafting. Conduit choice is crucial as it is
 Received:    First Decision:    Revised:    Accepted:    Published: x
               deemed to influence the long-term outcomes. While the important survival advantage of a left internal mammary
 Science Editor:    Copy Editor:    Production Editor: Jing Yu  artery graft over vein grafts is universally accepted, controversy reigns supreme regarding the next best conduit.
               There is plenty of evidence to suggest that arterial grafts are not only superior in terms of patency and survival,
               but they also protect the native coronary arteries against further progression of atherosclerotic disease. Total
               arterial coronary grafting, utilizing various configurations of bilateral internal mammary arteries, radial artery and
               occasionally right gastroepiploic artery is a safe and reproducible strategy. However, concerns about additional
               operative time, enhanced technical complexity, graft spasm with hypoperfusion, competitive flow, increased risk
               of bleeding, deep sternal wound infection, and most importantly lack of randomized trial data have prevented the
               universal adoption of total arterial coronary grafting. This review evaluates the currents outcomes of total arterial
               coronary grafting and summarizes the concerns and controversies associated with this strategy.


               Keywords: Coronary artery bypass grafting, bilateral internal mammary artery grafting, multiple arterial grafting,
               total arterial grafting, total arterial revascularization




               INTRODUCTION
               Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains, more than five decades after its introduction into
               clinical practice, the most scrutinized surgical procedure and a therapeutic intervention of paramount


                           © The Author(s) 2019. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use,
                sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long
                as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license,
                and indicate if changes were made.


                                                                                                                                                       www.vpjournal.net
   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219