Page 109 - Read Online
P. 109

Page 14 of 20                                                Orekhov et al. Vessel Plus 2019;3:10  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2019.04

               checkpoints in the transcriptional control and signaling network that trigger either pro-inflammatory or
               anti-inflammatory polarization.


               There are known factors that can mediate early “predifferentiation” of monocytes towards either
               inflammatory or anti-inflammatory phenotype in further differentiation to macrophages. However, it is
               still disputed whether monocytes can be presented in the “pre-inflammatory” or “pre-anti-inflammatory”
               state. In mice, it is likely that monocytes are generated as a Lyc6C-positive population in a bone marrow
               that is focused on the “classical” inflammatory differentiation to macrophages. The loss of this marker can
               designate the subset of blood monocytes that can survive in the bone marrow but develop expression of
               higher Lyc6C surface expression to patrol the circulation in order to observe the endothelial integrity in
               steady-state in response to inflammation. In humans, it is difficult to examine these modifications due to the
               mature state of monocytes coming from the bone marrow to the circulation.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Text preparation: Orekhov AN
               Collection and primary analysis of sources: Orekhova VA, Nikiforov NG, Myasoedova VA
               In-depth analysis: Grechko AV, Romanenko EB, Zhang D
               Writing the manuscript, editing English: Chistiakov DA


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               This work was supported by Russian Science Foundation (18-15-00254), Russian Federation.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2019.



               REFERENCES
               1.   Mosser DM, Edwards JP. Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat Rev Immunol 2008;8:958-69.
               2.   Mills CD. M1 and M2 macrophages: oracles of health and disease. Crit Rev Immunol 2012;32:463-88.
               3.   Rath M, Müller I, Kropf P, Closs EI, Munder M, et al. Metabolism via arginase or nitric oxide synthase: Two competing arginine
                   pathways in macrophages. Front Immunol 2014;5:532.
               4.   Geissmann F, Jung S, Littman DR. Blood monocytes consist of two principal subsets with distinct migratory properties. Immunity
                   2003;19:71-82.
               5.   Tacke F, Alvarez D, Kaplan TJ, Jakubzick C, Spanbroek R, et al. Monocyte subsets differentially employ CCR2, CCR5, and CX3CR1
                   to accumulate within atherosclerotic plaques. J Clin Invest 2007;117:185-94.
               6.   Yona S, Kim KW, Wolf Y, Mildner A, Varol D, et al. Fate mapping reveals origins and dynamics of monocytes and tissue macrophages
                   under homeostasis. Immunity 2013;38:79-91.
               7.   Varol C, Landsman L, Fogg DK, Greenshtein L, Gildor B, et al. Monocytes give rise to mucosal, but not splenic, conventional dendritic
   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114