Page 67 - Read Online
P. 67

Page 6 of 12                    Sabe et al. Vessel Plus 2024;8:2  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2023.95



































                Figure 2. Canagliflozin and sitagliptin therapy demonstrate comparable improvements in coronary perfusion to chronically ischemic
                myocardium.  Perfusion  expressed  as  mL/min/g  as  measured  by  microsphere  analysis  shown  at  rest  and  during  pacing  to
                150 beats/min in pigs receiving canagliflozin (CANA, eight animals), sitagliptin (SIT, five animals), or vehicle with no drug (CON, eight
                animals). **signifies a P value of less than 0.01.

               Sitagliptin is associated with improved coronary microvessel density compared to canagliflozin
               Sitagliptin-treated swine had improved arteriolar density (P = 0.05) and capillary density (P = 0.015) in
               chronically ischemic myocardium compared to control. Compared to canagliflozin-treated swine,
               sitagliptin-treated swine had improved capillary density (P = 0.022) with a trend towards improved
               arteriolar density (P = 0.14). (Figure 3, complete blots are shown in Supplementary Figure 1).

               Sitagliptin treatment is associated with reduced AMPK activation compared to canagliflozin in
               chronically ischemic myocardium
               In the ischemic myocardium of the canagliflozin-treated pigs, immunoblot experiments showed decreased
               activation of AMPK in SIT-treated pigs compared to CON pigs (P = 0.019) and CANA-treated swine
               (P = 0.019) as determined by the p-AMPK to AMPK ratio. Compared to canagliflozin-treated swine,
               sitagliptin trended towards increased activation of eNOS (P = 0.14), without difference in activation of
               ERK1/2 (P = 0.67). Both canagliflozin and sitagliptin were associated with increased expression of VE-
               Cadherin compared to control (P = 0.014 for both comparisons), without differences between treatment
               groups (P = 0.62).  [Figures 4 and 5].


               DISCUSSION
               In the present study, we utilized a large animal model of CMI to compare the cardiac effects of canagliflozin,
               a SGLT2i, and sitagliptin, a DPP4i. We determined that in the setting of CMI, CANA improved cardiac
               function compared to SIT, with similar effects on perfusion despite improved coronary microvessel
               collateralization in SIT-treated pigs. Sitagliptin was associated with reduced AMPK activation compared to
               canagliflozin in chronically ischemic myocardium. These findings together highlight the differing cardiac
               effects of two important classes of antihyperglycemic agents in the absence of diabetes.
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72