Page 220 - Read Online

Page 16 of 16 Riojas et al. Vessel Plus 2024;8:6 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2023.122

surgery, American heart association, american society of nuclear cardiology, and the society of cardiovascular computed tomography.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;143:780-803. DOI
33. Sousa-Uva M, Neumann FJ, Ahlsson A, et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial
revascularization. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019;55:4-90. DOI
34. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial
revascularization. Eur Heart J 2019;40:87-165. DOI
35. Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: executive
summary: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines.
Circulation 2022;145:e4-17. DOI
36. Serruys PW, Holmes DR, Farooq V, et al. Differences and similarities between American and European myocardial revascularization
guidelines. In: Serruys PW, Holmes DR, Farooq V, editors. State of the art surgical coronary revascularization. Oxford: Oxford
University Press; 2021. pp. 115-20.
37. Stirrup J, Velasco A, Hage FG, Reyes E. Comparison of ESC and ACC/AHA guidelines for myocardial revascularization. J Nucl
Cardiol 2017;24:1046-53. DOI PubMed PMC
38. Mishra PK, Luckraz H, Aktuerk D, Thekkudan J, Mahboob S, Norell M. How does the “heart team” decision get enacted for patients
with coronary artery disease? Heart Asia 2014;6:31-3. DOI PubMed PMC
39. Domingues CT, Milojevic M, Thuijs DJFM, et al. Heart team decision making and long-term outcomes for 1000 consecutive cases of
coronary artery disease. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2019;28:206-13. DOI
40. Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, et al; ISCHEMIA Research Group. Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary
disease. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1395-407. DOI PubMed
41. Lee C, Tully A, Fang JC, et al. Building and optimizing the interdisciplinary heart team. J Soc Cardiovasc Angio Interv
2023;2:101067. DOI
42. Batchelor WB, Anwaruddin S, Wang DD, et al. The multidisciplinary heart team in cardiovascular medicine:current role
and future challenges. JACC Adv 2023;2:100160. DOI
43. Tsang MB, Schwalm JD, Gandhi S, et al. Comparison of heart team vs interventional cardiologist recommendations for the treatment
of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e2012749. DOI PubMed PMC
44. Vervoort D, Dearani JA, Starnes VA, Thourani VH, Nguyen TC. Brave new world: virtual conferencing and surgical education in the
coronavirus disease 2019 era. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021;161:748-52. DOI PubMed PMC
45. Johnson BJ, Mabry JB. Remote work video meetings: workers’ emotional exhaustion and practices for greater well-being. Ger J Hum
Resour Manage 2022;36:380-408. DOI
46. Elbogen EB, Lanier M, Griffin SC, et al. A national study of zoom fatigue and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic:
implications for future remote work. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2022;25:409-15. DOI
47. Bergmann R, Rintel S, Baym N, et al. Meeting (the) pandemic: videoconferencing fatigue and evolving tensions of sociality in
enterprise video meetings during COVID-19. Comput Support Coop Work 2023;32:347-83. DOI PubMed PMC
48. Kezerle L, Yohanan E, Cohen A, et al. The impact of Heart Team discussion on decision making for coronary revascularization in
patients with complex coronary artery disease. J Card Surg 2020;35:2719-24. DOI
49. Kabrhel C, Rosovsky R, Channick R, et al. A multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response team: initial 30-month experience with
a novel approach to delivery of care to patients with submassive and massive pulmonary embolism. Chest 2016;150:384-93. DOI
50. Bonzel T, Schächinger V, Dörge H. Description of a heart team approach to coronary revascularization and its beneficial long-term
effect on clinical events after PCI. Clin Res Cardiol 2016;105:388-400. DOI PubMed
51. Holmes DR Jr, Mack M. The truly functional heart team: the devil is in the details. J Am Heart Assoc 2020;9:e05035. DOI PubMed
PMC
52. Patterson T, McConkey HZR, Ahmed-Jushuf F, et al. Long-term outcomes following heart team revascularization recommendations in
complex coronary artery disease. J Am Heart Assoc 2019;8:e011279. DOI PubMed PMC
53. Simcock R, Heaford A. Costs of multidisciplinary teams in cancer are small in relation to benefits. BMJ 2012;344:e3700. DOI
PubMed
54. Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a
report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg 2021;162:e183-353. DOI
55. Dehmer GJ, Grines CL, Bakaeen FG, et al; Writing Committee Members. 2023 AHA/ACC clinical performance and quality measures
for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association joint committee on
performance measures. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023;82:1131-74. DOI
56. Eurlings CGMJ, Bektas S, Sanders-van Wijk S, et al. Use of artificial intelligence to assess the risk of coronary artery disease without
additional (non-invasive) testing: validation in a low-risk to intermediate-risk outpatient clinic cohort. BMJ Open 2022;12:e055170.
DOI PubMed PMC
57. Panahiazar M, Chern Y, Riojas R, et al. An ontology for cardiothoracic surgical education and clinical data analytics. Stud Health
Technol Inform 2022;294:407-8. DOI PubMed PMC
58. Hurwitz J, Kirsch D. Machine learning for dummies, IBM limited edition. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2018.