Page 219 - Read Online

Riojas et al. Vessel Plus 2024;8:6 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2023.122 Page 15 of 16

5. Metkus TS, Beckie TM, Cohen MG, et al. The heart team for coronary revascularization decisions: 2 illustrative cases. JACC Case
Rep 2022;4:115-20. DOI PubMed PMC
6. Holmes DR Jr, Mack MJ, Kaul S, et al. 2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve
replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1200-54. DOI
7. Doll JA, Ohman EM, Patel MR, et al. A team-based approach to patients in cardiogenic shock. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
2016;88:424-33. DOI
8. Bloomer TL, Thomassee EJ, Fong PP. Acute pulmonary embolism network and multidisciplinary response team approach to
treatment. Crit Pathw Cardiol 2015;14:90-6. DOI
9. Luckraz H, Norell M, Buch M, James R, Cooper G. Structure and functioning of a multidisciplinary “heart team” for patients with
coronary artery disease: rationale and recommendations from a joint BCS/BCIS/SCTS working group. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
2015;48:524-9. DOI
10. Blankenship JC, Patel K. High rates of ad hoc PCI may mandate a modified heart team approach. JACC Cardiovasc Interv
2023;16:1743-5. DOI
11. Kolh P, Windecker S, Alfonso F, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the task force on myocardial
revascularization of the european society of cardiology (ESC) and the European association for cardio-thoracic surgery (EACTS).
Developed with the special contribution of the European association of percutaneous cardiovascular interventions (EAPCI). Eur J
Cardiothorac Surg 2014;46:517-92. DOI
12. Faridi KF, Rymer JA, Rao SV, et al. Ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable coronary artery disease: a
report from the national cardiovascular data registry cathPCI registry. Am Heart J 2019;216:53-61. DOI
13. Hannan EL, Samadashvili Z, Walford G, et al. Predictors and outcomes of ad hoc versus non-ad hoc percutaneous coronary
interventions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2:350-6. DOI
14. Hannan EL, Zhong Y, Cozzens K, et al. Ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention in stable patients with multivessel or unprotected
left main disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2023;16:1733-42. DOI PubMed
15. Vander Salm TJ, Kip KE, Jones RH, et al. What constitutes optimal surgical revascularization? : Answers from the bypass
angioplasty revascularization investigation (BARI)J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:565-72. DOI
16. Gaba P, Gersh BJ, Ali ZA, Moses JW, Stone GW. Complete versus incomplete coronary revascularization: definitions, assessment and
outcomes. Nat Rev Cardiol 2021;18:155-68. DOI PubMed
17. Yanagawa B, Puskas JD, Bhatt DL, Verma S. The coronary heart team. Curr Opin Cardiol 2017;32:627-32. DOI PubMed
18. Sanchez CE, Badhwar V, Dota A, et al. Practical implementation of the coronary revascularization heart team. Circ Cardiovasc Qual
Outcomes 2013;6:598-603. DOI
19. Pavlidis AN, Perera D, Karamasis GV, et al. Implementation and consistency of heart team decision-making in complex coronary
revascularisation. Int J Cardiol 2016;206:37-41. DOI
20. Rocha RV, Wang X, Fremes SE, et al. Variations in coronary revascularization practices and their effect on long-term outcomes. J Am
Heart Assoc 2022;11:e022770. DOI PubMed PMC
21. King III SB, Barnhart HX, Kosinski AS, et al. Angioplasty or surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease: comparison of eligible
registry and randomized patients in the EAST Trial and influence of treatment selection on outcomes. Emory angioplasty versus
surgery trial investigators. Am J Cardiol 1997;79:1453-9. DOI
22. Hamm CW, Reimers J, Ischinger T, Rupprecht HJ, Berger J, Bleifeld W. A randomized study of coronary angioplasty compared with
bypass surgery in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary disease. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1037-43. DOI PubMed
23. Feit F, Brooks MM, Sopko G, et al. Long-term clinical outcome in the bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation registry.
Comparison with the randomized trial. Circulation 2000;101:2795-802. DOI
24. BARI Investigators. The BARI protocol. Protocol for the bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation. Circulation 1991;84[suppl
V]:V-1-27.Avaliable from: https://biolincc.nhlbi.nih.gov/media/studies/bari/Protocol.pdf?link_time=2019-12-02_01:21:53.397374
[Last accessed on 19 Jan 2024].
25. The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for
Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;38:S1-52. DOI
26. Yamasaki M, Abe K, Horikoshi R, et al. Enhanced outcomes for coronary artery disease obtained by a multidisciplinary heart team
approach. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019;67:841-8. DOI
27. Papolos AI, Kenigsberg BB, Berg DD, et al; Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Investigators. Management and outcomes of
cardiogenic shock in cardiac ICUs with versus without shock teams. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;78:1309-17. DOI
28. Holmes DR Jr, Rich JB, Zoghbi WA, Mack MJ. The heart team of cardiovascular care. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:903-7. DOI
29. Young MN, Kolte D, Cadigan ME, et al. Multidisciplinary heart team approach for complex coronary artery disease: single center
clinical presentation. J Am Heart Assoc 2020;9:e014738. DOI PubMed PMC
30. Campos CM, Stanetic BM, Farooq V, et al; SYNTAX II Study Group. Risk stratification in 3-vessel coronary artery disease: applying
the SYNTAX score II in the heart team discussion of the SYNTAX II trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2015;86:E229-38. DOI
31. Ma H, Lin S, Li X, Wang Y, Xu B, Zheng Z. Effect of a standardised heart team protocol versus a guideline-based protocol on
revascularisation decision stability in stable complex coronary artery disease: rationale and design of a randomised trial of cardiology
specialists using historic cases. BMJ Open 2022;12:e064761. DOI PubMed PMC
32. Patel MR, Dehmer GJ, Hirshfeld JW, et al. ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 appropriate use criteria for
coronary revascularization focused update: a report of the American college of cardiology foundation appropriate use criteria task
force, society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions, society of thoracic surgeons, American association for thoracic