Page 115 - Read Online
P. 115

Page 10 of 11               Flattery et al. Vessel Plus 2024;8:26  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2023.130

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approvement and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2024.


               REFERENCES
               1.       Xu J, Lo S. Fundamentals and role of intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther
                   2020;10:1358-70.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               2.       Mintz GS, Matsumura M, Ali Z, Maehara A. Clinical utility of intravascular imaging: past, present, and future. JACC Cardiovasc Imag
                   2022;15:1799-820.  DOI
               3.       Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al; Writing Committee Members. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery
                   revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice
                   Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022;79:e21-129.  DOI  PubMed
               4.       Smilowitz NR, Mohananey D, Razzouk L, Weisz G, Slater JN. Impact and trends of intravascular imaging in diagnostic coronary
                   angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in inpatients in the United States. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2018;92:E410-5.
                   DOI  PubMed  PMC
               5.       Shlofmitz E, Ali ZA, Maehara A, Mintz GS, Shlofmitz R, Jeremias A. Intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary
                   intervention: a universal approach for optimization of stent implantation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2020;13:e008686.  DOI  PubMed
               6.       Jakabcin J, Spacek R, Bystron M, et al. Long-term health outcome and mortality evaluation after invasive coronary treatment using
                   drug eluting stents with or without the IVUS guidance. Randomized control trial. HOME DES IVUS. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
                   2010;75:578-83.  DOI  PubMed
               7.       Mariani J Jr, Guedes C, Soares P, et al. Intravascular ultrasound guidance to minimize the use of iodine contrast in percutaneous
                   coronary intervention: the MOZART (minimizing cOntrast utiliZation with IVUS guidance in coRonary angioplasTy) randomized
                   controlled trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:1287-93.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               8.       Wang HX, Dong PS, Li ZJ, Wang HL, Wang K, Liu XY. Application of intravascular ultrasound in the emergency diagnosis and
                   treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Echocardiography 2015;32:1003-8.  DOI  PubMed
               9.       Zhang J, Gao X, Kan J, et al. Intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: the ULTIMATE
                   trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:3126-37.  DOI  PubMed
               10.      Gao XF, Ge Z, Kong XQ, et al; ULTIMATE Investigators. 3-year outcomes of the ULTIMATE trial comparing intravascular
                   ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021;14:247-57.  DOI
               11.      Chieffo A, Latib A, Caussin C, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of intravascular-ultrasound guided compared to angiography
                   guided stent implantation in complex coronary lesions: the AVIO trial. Am Heart J 2013;165:65-72.  DOI
               12.      Lee  JM,  Choi  KH,  Song  YB,  et  al.  Intravascular  Imaging-Guided  or  Angiography-Guided  Complex  PCI.  N  Engl  J  Med
                   2023;388:1668-79.  DOI  PubMed
               13.      Hong D, Kim SM, Lee SY, et al. Prognostic impact of intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in chronic
                   total occlusion. Circulation 2023;148:903-5.  DOI  PubMed
               14.      Kwon W, Lee JM, Yun KH, et al. Clinical benefit of intravascular imaging compared with conventional angiography in left main
                   coronary artery intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2023;16:e013359.  DOI  PubMed
               15.      Hahn YH. Impact of intravascular imaging in patients with ACS undergoing complex PCI A prespecified substudy of the
                   RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI. TCT 2023; 2023 Oct 23-26; San Francisco, California, USA.
               16.      Tian NL, Gami SK, Ye F, et al. Angiographic and clinical comparisons of intravascular ultrasound- versus angiography-guided drug-
                   eluting stent implantation for patients with chronic total occlusion lesions: two-year results from a randomised AIR-CTO study.
                   EuroIntervention 2015;10:1409-17.  DOI
               17.      Kim BK, Shin DH, Hong MK, et al. Clinical impact of intravascular ultrasound-guided chronic total occlusion intervention with
                   zotarolimus-eluting versus biolimus-eluting stent implantation: randomized study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:e002592.  DOI
               18.      Kim JS, Kang TS, Mintz GS, et al. Randomized comparison of clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound and angiography-
   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120