Page 797 - Read Online
P. 797

Bair et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2020;7:68                                      Plastic and
               DOI: 10.20517/2347-9264.2020.74                                   Aesthetic Research




               Systematic Review                                                             Open Access


               Surgical management of jaw-winking synkinesis
               and ptosis in Marcus Gunn syndrome: a systematic

               outcomes analysis


               Henry Bair , Giancarlo A. Garcia , Benjamin P. Erickson 1
                                            1
                        1,2
               1 Department of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute at Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94303, USA.
               2 Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

               Correspondence to: Dr. Giancarlo A. Garcia, Department of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute at Stanford University, 2452
               Watson Court, Palo Alto, CA 94303, USA. E-mail: garcia.giancar@gmail.com

               How to cite this article: Bair H, Garcia GA, Erickson BP. Surgical management of jaw-winking synkinesis and ptosis in Marcus Gunn
               syndrome: a systematic outcomes analysis. Plast Aesthet Res 2020;7:68. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2020.74

               Received: 12 Apr 2020    First Decision: 19 Aug 2020    Revised: 5 Sep 2020    Accepted: 5 Nov 2020    Published: 5 Dec 2020
               Academic Editor: Raúl González-García    Copy Editor: Cai-Hong Wang    Production Editor: Jing Yu



               Abstract
               Aim: Marcus Gunn jaw-winking synkinesis (MGJWS) is characterized by congenital ptosis in conjunction with
               rapid and involuntary elevation of the affected upper eyelid upon contraction of the ipsilateral external pterygoid
               muscle. Selecting an approach to the surgical management of eyelid malposition in this syndrome is challenging
               and requires careful discussion with each patient’s family. In this systematic review, we describe reported surgical
               approaches, assess outcomes data, and attempt to identify areas of consensus in the management of MGJWS.

               Methods: Twenty-seven peer-reviewed studies were identified, describing a variety of interventions.

               Results: The most commonly-used surgical techniques included: bilateral levator excision with bilateral frontalis
               sling, unilateral levator excision with bilateral or unilateral frontalis sling, the Neuhaus/Lemagne method, and
               levator plication surgery. However, no clear outcomes-based consensus regarding choice of surgical approach was
               identified, highlighting the ongoing role of surgeon and family preference in the selection of management strategy.
               Further, there was considerable variability in the literature for reporting outcome measures, including grading
               schemes for ptosis and jaw-wink.

               Conclusion: The existing literature on management of MGJWS does not enable the development of an evidence-
               based consensus algorithm regarding the selection of an appropriate surgical technique. The disorder is



                           © The Author(s) 2020. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use,
                sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long
                as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license,
                and indicate if changes were made.


                                                                                                                                                     www.parjournal.net
   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802