Page 784 - Read Online
P. 784

Page 6 of 8                                        Callaghan. Plast Aesthet Res 2020;7:66  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2020.166
                                                           [40]
               which ultimately can be used to detect blood flow . This is relevant to scarring because adequate tissue
               perfusion is necessary for the healing process to take place. This technology has been studied in patients
               with systemic sclerosis and can detect a reduction of blood perfusion in areas affected by Raynaud’s
               phenomenon. It also has been used to demonstrate that a decrease in blood perfusion is found in patients
                                   [41]
               with microangiopathy . LSCI has also been used to help evaluate burn wounds which is important,
               because it can detect the severity of partial-thickness wounds, which in turn influences treatment .
                                                                                                 [42]

               CONCLUSION
               Scarring, regardless of etiology, is a challenging but treatable condition that can make a significant
               difference in the lives of patients. Although energy-based devices are the workhorses of many treatment
               regimens, they are not absolutely necessary, and any physician can be equipped to manage them. A
               thorough understanding of different types of scars is crucial to tailor a treatment course for individual
               patients. The treatment of acne scars differs depending on whether they are ice pick, rolling or boxcar scars.
               Surgical scars may be raised or depressed, or suffer from pigmentary changes, and treatments vary for each.
               As our understanding of the formation and maturation of scars continues to develop, new technologies will
               likely emerge to target scars or even inhibit their formation altogether.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Contribute solely to the article: Callaghan DJ

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.

               Conflicts of interest
               The author declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2020.


               REFERENCES
               1.   Abdel Hay R, Shalaby K, Zaher H, et al. Interventions for acne scars. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;4:CD011946.
               2.   Levy LL, Zeichner JA. Management of acne scarring, part II: a comparative review of non-laser-based, minimally invasive approaches.
                   Am J Clin Dermatol 2012;13:331-40.
               3.   Jacob CI, Dover JS, Kaminer MS. Acne scarring: a classification system and review of treatment options. J Am Acad Dermatol
                   2001;45:109-17.
               4.   Khunger N, Bhardwaj D, Khunger M. Evaluation of CROSS technique with 100% TCA in the management of ice pick acne scars in
                   darker skin types. J Cosmet Dermatol 2011;10:51-7.
               5.   Dalpizzol M, Weber MB, Mattiazzi AP, Manzoni AP. Comparative study of the use of trichloroacetic acid and phenolic acid in the
                   treatment of atrophic-type acne scars. Dermatol Surg 2016;42:377-83.
               6.   Ramesh M, Gopal M, Kumar S, Talwar A. Novel technology in the treatment of acne scars: the matrix-tunable radiofrequency technology.
   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789