Page 252 - Read Online
P. 252

Page 4 of 11                                    Yamakawa et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2020;7:24  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2020.20

                A                                 B                          C






















               Figure 3. A 43-year-old male smoker with left hand amputation. A: amputated left hand; B: on X-ray, the left hand was completely cut
               at the metacarpal level; C: contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed poor blood circulation of the radial artery in the distal
               forearm

               CASE REPORTS
               Case 1: reconstruction after hand replantation
               A 43-year-old man had his hand amputated. He accidentally cut his non-dominant left hand with
               an electric saw while cutting wood [Figure 3A]. His left hand was amputated at the metacarpal level.
               X-ray examination and contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the affected limb were performed
               [Figure 3B and C]. The surfaces of both parts were crushed and severely damaged. Hand replantation
               surgery was performed under general anesthesia. After bone fixation and tendon repair, microvascular
               anastomosis was performed. The ulnar side of the palmar arterial was repaired, but not the radial side
               because the flow through the radial artery was insufficient. Venous repair was performed by vein grafting
               into three dorsal hand cutaneous veins. The dorsal hand defect after debridement of crushed skin was
               covered by artificial dermis. The amputated hand survived. Seventeen days after hand replantation surgery,
               the second operation for reconstruction of the dorsal hand tissue defect was performed. As contrast-
               enhanced computed tomography after hand replantation surgery revealed an incomplete palmar arch,
               the combination of a radial artery perforator adipofascial flap and split-thickness skin graft was selected.
               The radial artery perforators were identified using color Doppler ultrasonography and demarcated on the
               skin [Figure 4]. There was a 4-cm × 7-cm defect over the dorsal hand with exposure of extensor digitorum
               tendons after debridement of necrotized tissue. A lazy S-shaped longitudinal incision on the forearm was
               designed [Figure 5A]. An 18-cm × 5-cm radial artery perforator-based adipofascial flap was elevated. As
               a vascular pedicle, the distal radial artery fasciocutaneous perforator was left with the soft tissue around
               the styloid process [Figure 5B]. The flap was turned over and transferred to the defect. A skin graft was
               immediately placed over the flap. The donor site of the flap was closed [Figure 5C]. The postoperative
               course was uneventful. The flap and skin graft took completely. Half a year after surgery, the skin of the
               reconstructed dorsal hand was thin and pliable [Figure 6A and B]. In addition, there was no restriction in
               the mobility of the wrist or forearm [Figure 6C and D]. However, the thumb-index finger web space was
               narrow due to poor thumb bone healing caused by poor blood supply. A free flap transfer to the thumb-
               index finger web space is planned in the next surgery.

               Case 2: functional reconstruction of index finger extension
               A 62-year-old man accidentally injured his non-dominant left hand while shaving wood. Skin and soft
               tissue defects were observed, in addition to exposure of the second metacarpal bone head on the dorsal side
   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257