Page 47 - Read Online
P. 47

Page 14 of 16             Raman et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2023;10:6  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2022.62

               outcomes and, in some instances, precluded any statistical analysis. Nevertheless, our study remains a
               comprehensive systematic review of the current outcome-based research on VLNT and should encourage
               future studies to standardize clinical staging, methodologies, and outcome measures.


               CONCLUSION
               VLNT is a promising treatment modality for many patients with lymphedema, which has previously been
               thought to be a progressive, chronic disease. New donor sites, such as the omental, appendiceal, ileocecal,
               and jejunal mesenteric, have offered possible advantages in mitigating the risk of donor-site lymphedema
               for patients while overall resulting in a greater reduction in infectious episodes in comparison to extra-
               abdominal donor sites. This warrants additional consideration in the literature. With more consistent
               methodology and reporting, patient-reported outcomes and clinical outcomes could be better compared
               between studies and offer more robust data to guide surgical practice in VLNT for lymphedema patients.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Initial literature search: Yaeger L
               Made substantial contributions to conception and design of the study and performed data analysis and
               interpretation: Christensen JM, Raman S, Sanka SA, Ji J, Skolnick GB
               Performed data acquisition, as well as provided substantial contributions to the manuscript: Raman S,
               Sanka SA, Ji J
               Provided significant guidance and feedback in manuscript editing process: Christensen JM, Skolnick GB


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.

               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not Applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not Applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2023.


               REFERENCES
               1.       Sleigh BC, Manna B. Lymphedema. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537239/ [Last accessed on 16 Feb
                   2023].
               2.       Cormier JN, Askew RL, Mungovan KS, Xing Y, Ross MI, Armer JM. Lymphedema beyond breast cancer: a systematic review and
                   meta-analysis of cancer-related secondary lymphedema. Cancer 2010;116:5138-49.  DOI  PubMed
               3.       Grada AA, Phillips TJ. Lymphedema: pathophysiology and clinical manifestations. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017;77:1009-20.  DOI
                   PubMed
               4.       Petrek JA, Heelan MC. Incidence of breast carcinoma-related lymphedema. Cancer 1998;83:2776-81.  DOI  PubMed
               5.       Hinrichs CS, Watroba NL, Rezaishiraz H, et al. Lymphedema secondary to postmastectomy radiation: incidence and risk factors. Ann
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52