Page 44 - Read Online
P. 44

Raman et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2023;10:6  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2022.62  Page 11 of 16






































                Figure 3. Forest plot depicting the average improvement in overall LYMQOL scores for each of these studies. Studies that did not report
                the standard deviations of the scores were excluded from this plot.

               DISCUSSION
               Lymphedema is a chronic, progressive condition that can significantly diminish the quality of life of
               patients . Though conservative therapy is currently still the gold standard for management, evidence for
                      [24]
               physiologic procedures such as VLNT is increasing [25,26] . Given their recent development, this systematic
               review found that jejunal mesenteric, appendicular, and ileocecal donor sites have been relatively
               understudied and warrant more consideration in future research. Overall, standardization in protocols and
               outcome measures is lacking.


               Clinical outcomes
               There is limited data available to guide donor site selection in VLNT, leaving surgeon preference,
               considerations for patient preference, and prior surgery or anatomic concerns to determine current
               practice. Furthermore, the available studies implemented a variety of methodologies and study designs,
               which restricted direct comparisons between investigations and made it difficult to draw definitive
               conclusions regarding the optimal VLNT donor site [Supplementary Table 2].

               Overall, some outcomes were reported in the literature more uniformly than others. For instance, the
               majority of investigations reported limb measurements as an outcome to characterize the efficacy of the
               procedure. From these studies, the vast majority reported reductions in limb size [Supplementary Table 3].
               It cannot be understated, however, that contrasting methodologies could significantly affect the
               generalizability of these results. Limbs were measured in circumference [27-29]  or volume [30,31] , though variances
               were also present beyond these two categories, including circumference rate reduction [32-34] , upper/lower
                                                            [38]
               extremity lymphedema index [35-37] , and volume ratios  [Supplementary Table 2]. The specific method used
               to  obtain  circumference  and  volume  measurements  differed  between  investigations  as  well
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49