Page 41 - Read Online
P. 41

Zisman et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2022;9:15                                   Plastic and
               DOI: 10.20517/2347-9264.2021.113
                                                                                Aesthetic Research




               Review                                                                        Open Access



               Management of urethral strictures after
               masculinizing genital surgery in transgender men


               Ariel Zisman, Joseph A. Baiocco, Rajveer S. Purohit

               Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY 10075, USA.
               Correspondence to: Dr. Ariel Zisman, Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, 445 E. 77th
               Street, New York, NY 10075, USA. E-mail: ariel.zisman@mountsinai.org

               How to cite this article: Zisman A, Baiocco JA, Purohit RS. Management of urethral strictures after masculinizing genital surgery
               in transgender men. Plast Aesthet Res 2022;9:15. https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2021.113

               Received: 8 Oct 2021  First Decision: 16 Dec 2021  Revised: 1 Jan 2022  Accepted: 17 Jan 2022  Published: 16 Feb 2022

               Academic Editors: Stan Monstrey, ML Djordjevic  Copy Editor: Xi-Jun Chen  Production Editor: Xi-Jun Chen

               Abstract
               Transgender men undergoing phalloplasty and metoidioplasty have a high rate of urethral stricture. Evaluation of
               stricture includes evaluation of symptoms and uroflow, cystoscopy, and retrograde urethrogram. Important
               anatomic differences between the phallus of cis-gender and transgender men increase the likelihood and
               complexity of treating urethral strictures in transgender men after surgery. Urethral strictures after masculinizing
               procedures are more likely to require open surgical treatment and recur after treatment. There is a paucity of data,
               but less invasive options such as dilation and urethrotomy have had minimal success. Open surgical options with a
               variety of techniques, including one-stage and two-stage techniques, have higher success rates in treating
               strictures, but there is minimal comparative data on outcomes. We present a review on management options for
               urethral reconstruction in transgender men and our data on urethroplasty for these patients.

               Keywords: Phalloplasty, urethroplasty, urethral stricture disease, gender-affirming surgery, metoidioplasty



               INTRODUCTION
               Phalloplasty and metoidioplasty are technically challenging masculinizing genital surgeries for transgender
               men. A metoidioplasty with urethral lengthening is a definitive option offering a sensate phallus and
               permitting urination while standing. For other men, the final end-point is a phalloplasty with urethral
               construction and with penile implants, one that permits penetrative intercourse. The creation of the







                           © The Author(s) 2022. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing,
                           adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as
               long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and
               indicate if changes were made.

                                                                                            www.parjournal.net
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46