Page 30 - Read Online

have a faster rate of healing for both chronic and acute wound‑healing: a new perspective for wound‑therapy? Arch Dermatol Res
wounds. In the present study, a significant decrease in 2007;298:413‑20.
[8]
the wound surface pH of chronic wounds (P = 0.048) 7. Percival SL, McCarty S, Hunt JA, Woods EJ. The effects of pH on
wound healing, biofilms and antimicrobial efficacy. Wound Repair Regen
was noted in patients treated with the LAD as compared 2014;22:174‑86.
with the conventional group. The lower pH may be one 8. Kumar P. Exploiting potency of negative pressure in wound dressing using
of the factors responsible for improved wound healing limited access dressing and suction‑assisted dressing. Indian J Plast Surg
with LAD as experienced clinically. [18‑21] Lower systemic 9. 2012;45:302‑15.
Shukla VK, Shukla D, Tiwary SK, Aqrawal S, Rastoqi A. Evaluation of pH
toxic symptoms in patients treated by LAD may be due to measurement as a method of wound assessment. J Wound Care 2007;16:291‑4.
reduced activity of bacteria and bacterial toxins under the 10. Gethin G. The significance of surface pH in chronic wounds. Wounds UK
influence of a lower pH. 2007;3:52‑6.
11. Wilson IA, Henry M, Quill RD, Byrne PJ. The pH of varicose ulcer surfaces
In conclusion, the study showed a reduction in the wound and its relationship to healing. Vasa 1979;8:339‑42.
pH in LAD treated patients as compared to those who 12. Tsukada K, Tokunaga K, Iwama T, Mishima Y. The pH changes of pressure
received a conventional dressing treatment. Lowering the ulcers related to the healing process of wounds. Wounds 1992;4:16‑20.
pH in chronic wounds may accelerate wound healing by 13. Romanelli M, Schipani E, Piaggesi A, Barachini P. Evaluation of surface pH
on venous leg ulcers under allevyn dressings. In: International Congress
reestablishing equilibrium in the wound bed. and Symposium Series‑Royal Society of Medicine, editors. Evidence‑based
Woundcare. Proceedings of a Conference Sponsored by Smith and Nephew;
Financial support and sponsorship 1997 November, 17, UK. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press; 1998.
Nil. p. 57‑60.
14. Roberts G, Hammad L, Creevy J, Shearman C, Mani R. Physical changes in
Conflicts of interest dermal tissues around chronic venous ulcers. In: Proceedings of the European
There are no conflicts of interest. Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1997 November, 18‑20.
Harrogate, UK. London: EMAP Healthcare Ltd.; 1998. p. 104‑5.
15. Greener B, Hughes AA, Bannister NP, Douglass J. Proteases and pH in
REFERENCES chronic wounds. J Wound Care 2005;14:59‑61.
16. Gethin GT, Cowman S, Conroy RM. The impact of Manuka honey dressings
1. Callam MJ, Ruckley CV, Harper DR, Dale JJ. Chronic ulceration of the on the surface pH of chronic wounds. Int Wound J 2008;5:185‑94.
leg: extent of the problem and provision of care. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 17. Molan PC. Re‑introducing honey in the management of wounds and
1985;290:1855‑6. ulcers‑theory and practice. Ostomy Wound Manage 2002;48:28‑40.
2. Nelzen O, Bergqvist D, Lindhagen A. The prevalence of lower‑limb 18. Kumar PP, Sharma A. The limited access dressing for damage control in
ulceration has been underestimated: results of a validated population trauma patients. Wounds 2010;22:188‑92.
questionnaire. Br J Surg 1996;83:255‑8. 19. Sreenivas T, Nandish Kumar KC, Menon J, Nataraj AR. Calcific myonecrosis
3. O’Brien JF, Grace PA, Perry IJ, Burke PE. Prevalence and aetiology of leg of the leg treated by debridement and limited access dressing. Int Low Extrem
ulcers in Ireland. Ir J Med Sci 2000;169:110‑2. Wounds 2013;12:44‑9.
4. Ye RC. The relationship of pH of the granulation tissue and the take of the 20. Friji MT, Mohapatra DP, Chittoria RK, Dinesh Kumar S, Ashokan A,
skin graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 1957;19:213‑7. Vijayaraghavan N. Use of urine collection bag as an alternative of
5. Leveen HH, Falk G, Borek B, Diaz C, Lynfield Y, Wynkoop BJ, Mabunda GA, custom‑made plastic bag for limited access dressing (LAD). J Soc Wound
Rubricius JL, Christoudias GC. Chemical acidification of wounds: an adjuvant Care Res 2013;6:36‑9.
to healing and the unfavorable action of alkalinity and ammonia. Ann Surg 21. Chittoria RK, Kumar P, Bajaj SP, Singh AK, Gupta DK. General clinical
1973;178:745‑53. guidelines for wound management: redefining acronym SWCR. J Soc Wound
6. Schneider LA, Korber A, Grabbe S, Dissemond J. Influence of pH on Care Res 2014;7:2‑7.

260 Plast Aesthet Res || Vol 2 || Issue 5 || Sep 15, 2015