Page 72 - Read Online
P. 72

Page 14 of 14            Pignet et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2024;11:40  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2024.54

                   excision and subsequent skin autografting: dermal substitute prevents functional limitations. J Burn Care Res 2020;41:1079-83.  DOI
                   PubMed
               35.      Asuku M, Yu TC, Yan Q, et al. Split-thickness skin graft donor-site morbidity: a systematic literature review. Burns 2021;47:1525-46.
                   DOI  PubMed
               36.      Barnea Y, Amir A, Leshem D, et al. Clinical comparative study of aquacel and paraffin gauze dressing for split-skin donor site
                   treatment. Ann Plast Surg 2004;53:132-6.  DOI  PubMed
               37.      Voineskos SH, Ayeni OA, McKnight L, Thoma A. Systematic review of skin graft donor-site dressings. Plast Reconstr Surg
                   2009;124:298-306.  DOI  PubMed
               38.      García-salinas A, Mecott G, García-pérez M, et al. Decreased pain in split-thickness skin graft donor sites with the use of a non-
                   adherent polyurethane dressing. Med Univ 2015;17:196-202.  DOI
               39.      Mantha S, Thisted R, Foss J, Ellis JE, Roizen MF. A proposal to use confidence intervals for visual analog scale data for pain
                   measurement to determine clinical significance. Anesth Analg 1993;77:1041-7.  DOI  PubMed
               40.      Baczako A, Fischer T, Konstantinow A, Volz T. [Acute wounds]. MMW Fortschr Med 2019;161:46-53.  DOI  PubMed
               41.      Zeiderman MR, Pu LLQ. Contemporary approach to soft-tissue reconstruction of the lower extremity after trauma. Burns Trauma
                   2021;9:tkab024.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77