Page 72 - Read Online
P. 72
Page 14 of 14 Pignet et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2024;11:40 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2024.54
excision and subsequent skin autografting: dermal substitute prevents functional limitations. J Burn Care Res 2020;41:1079-83. DOI
PubMed
35. Asuku M, Yu TC, Yan Q, et al. Split-thickness skin graft donor-site morbidity: a systematic literature review. Burns 2021;47:1525-46.
DOI PubMed
36. Barnea Y, Amir A, Leshem D, et al. Clinical comparative study of aquacel and paraffin gauze dressing for split-skin donor site
treatment. Ann Plast Surg 2004;53:132-6. DOI PubMed
37. Voineskos SH, Ayeni OA, McKnight L, Thoma A. Systematic review of skin graft donor-site dressings. Plast Reconstr Surg
2009;124:298-306. DOI PubMed
38. García-salinas A, Mecott G, García-pérez M, et al. Decreased pain in split-thickness skin graft donor sites with the use of a non-
adherent polyurethane dressing. Med Univ 2015;17:196-202. DOI
39. Mantha S, Thisted R, Foss J, Ellis JE, Roizen MF. A proposal to use confidence intervals for visual analog scale data for pain
measurement to determine clinical significance. Anesth Analg 1993;77:1041-7. DOI PubMed
40. Baczako A, Fischer T, Konstantinow A, Volz T. [Acute wounds]. MMW Fortschr Med 2019;161:46-53. DOI PubMed
41. Zeiderman MR, Pu LLQ. Contemporary approach to soft-tissue reconstruction of the lower extremity after trauma. Burns Trauma
2021;9:tkab024. DOI PubMed PMC