Page 58 - Read Online
P. 58

Dengsoe et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2024;11:25  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2024.20  Page 7 of 10

                                 [26]
               Nguyen et al.’s study  is different from the others because the study designs lack a control group. Despite
               this, it is still relevant to discuss their experiences with DIEP-flaps and correlate these to the other studies.
               Adjuvant chemotherapy was initiated after a mean time of 35 days and all within 7 weeks after surgery.
                                                           [15]
                                                                    [23]
               These correlate well with the findings of Wilson  and Lee  but are notably shorter than the other
               included studies [16,22,24] . The rate of complications was more than 50%, including four patients needing
               further surgery due to either venous congestion or total flap loss. Those who underwent reoperation still
               managed to initiate adjuvant therapy within 7 weeks, indicating that the complications did not lead to
               clinically significant treatment delays. These findings are similar to those by Wilson et al. but stand in
               contrast to the four other studies [15,16,22,24,25]  which all describe that complications postpone the initiation of
               adjuvant therapy to some extent, but not for longer than 12 weeks.


               Adjuvant radiotherapy
               Only one study by O’Connell et al. investigates how immediate free flap reconstruction affects the initiation
                                      [24]
               of adjuvant radiotherapy . It is well known that administering radiotherapy after implant-based
               reconstruction is not recommended due to the significant risk of developing functionally and cosmetically
               constraining capsular contractions [29,30] . In fact, there has been a tendency to refrain from immediate
               reconstruction in general if the patient was expected to need adjuvant radiotherapy. For instance, the
               Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) has suggested opting for delayed breast reconstruction in these
               situations . Two  meta-analyses  in  2017   and  2021   both  conclude  that  immediate  free  flap
                                                                [32]
                       [27]
                                                     [31]
               reconstruction should be considered a viable treatment option in patients requiring adjuvant radiotherapy.
               Late complications were found to be comparable to those of delayed breast reconstruction. Additionally,
               breast aesthetics and quality of life, evaluated from the patient's perspective, were not compromised by flap
               exposure to radiation therapy. The optimal timing of adjuvant radiotherapy is not well-established. A meta-
               analysis of 21 retrospective studies has shown an increased risk of loco-regional recurrence if radiotherapy
                                                              [17]
               is delayed for more than eight weeks following surgery . In contrast, another large cohort study found no
               significant difference in survival with delays of up to 20 weeks, though it should be noted that this accounts
               for  patients  undergoing  breast  conserving  surgery . The  Danish  Breast  Cancer  Group  (DBCG)
                                                              [18]
               recommends that radiotherapy should be initiated as soon as possible and that the maximum time from
               surgery should not exceed 12 weeks . O’Connell et al. found that the prevalence of radiotherapy delays for
                                             [19]
                                                                                             [24]
               more than eight weeks was similar in the free-flap ground and the mastectomy-only group . There were
               no examples of treatment delays of more than twelve weeks - regardless of procedure type or complications.
               This study provides data showing that immediate free flap reconstruction in the setting of adjuvant
               radiotherapy does not seem to affect loco-regional recurrence rates or survival. These findings support that
               immediate free flap reconstruction could be considered a viable treatment option in patients requiring
               adjuvant radiotherapy when the treatment is performed in experienced centers with integrated
               collaboration between breast surgery, plastic surgery, and oncology.

               In general, this systematic review presents data showing that immediate free flap reconstruction is
               associated with a longer time to initiation of adjuvant therapy compared to mastectomy-only. The mean
                                                                                                       [16]
                                                                              [23]
               difference between the two groups spanned from two days in Lee et al.  to 14 days in Kontos et al. .
               Adjuvant therapy was initiated after four to ten weeks in most cases - regardless of reconstruction or not -
               and there were only few examples of delays of more than 12 weeks. Patients treated with mastectomy-only
               were equally likely to experience delays of more than 12 weeks. Authors broadly comment that the clinal
               significance of this difference between free flap reconstruction and mastectomy-only is expected to be
               minimal or non-existing in most cases. As presented in the introduction of the review, the literature
               generally agrees that delays in adjuvant therapy beyond 12 weeks after surgery are associated with increased
               breast cancer recurrence and mortality, but uniform data on the clinical effects of delays within this interval
               are lacking. A population-based study by Chaves-MacGregor et al. including 24,843 Californian women
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63