Page 48 - Read Online
P. 48

Swedberg et al. One Health Implement Res 2023;3:77-96  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ohir.2023.02  Page 87

               Table 3. Characteristics of bite patients and human deaths from PHO records before the study (2019) and during the study period
               (2020 to 2022)

                Year               2019      2020       2021      2022       Average per study year (2020-2022)
                                   pre-study
                Recorded human deaths  5     9          7         9          8
                Total bite patients  9,217   8,370      11,269    14,308     11,316
                Mean monthly patients  768   698        939       1,192      943
                Bite incidence per 100 k  1,015  921    1,241     1,575      1,246
                % male             49.5      49.9       48.2      47.6       48.4
                Bites U15yrs (%)   3,781 (41)  3,548 (42.4)  5,065 (44.9)  5,714 (39.9)  4,776 (42.2)
                Category I (%)     106 (1.2)  307 (3.7)  26 (0.2)  30 (0.2)  121 (1.1)
                Category II (%)    7,322 (79.4)  6,257 (74.8)  9,189 (81.5)  11,535 (80.6)  8,994 (79.5)
                Category III (%)   1,789 (19.4)  1,806 (21.6)  2,054 (18.2)  2,743 (19.2)  2,201 (19.5)
                ERIG (% of Category III)  1,445 (80.8)  1,459 (80.8)  1,603 (78)  2,197 (80.1)  1,753 (79.6)
                Dog bite (%)       6,311 (68.5)  5,947 (71.1)  7,768 (68.9)  9,289 (64.9)  7,668 (67.8)
                Cat bite (%)       2,744 (29.8)  2,352 (28.1)  3,429 (30.4)  4,912 (34.3)  3,564 (31.5)
                Bite by other animal (%)  162 (1.8)  71 (0.8)  72 (0.6)  107 (0.7)  83 (0.7)
               ERIG: Equine rabies immunoglobulin; PHO: Provincial Health Office.


               Extrapolating the proportion of high-risk bites from IBCM data (2.5%) to total bite patients in the province
               (33,947), we estimate 838 high-risk bites over 3 years, with an average of 279 per year. One ABTC, located in
               a major hospital in Calapan, reported nearly complete data during the study. These data represented 47.9%
               (6,055/12,640) of IBCM records, with 0.96% of bites assessed to be high-risk (3.7% for high-risk + unknown-
               risk). Using these proportions for comparison with incomplete IBCM data, we estimated 325 high-risk bites
               over 3 years and an average of 108 per year. When assuming only dog bites are high-risk, based on RADDL
               records which found no cats tested positive over the last 5 years, we estimate 2.8% (240/8,701) of bites to be
               high-risk (5.2% for high-risk + unknown-risk, 449/8,701).

               Over the course of the 3 years (2020-2022), 25 human deaths were formally investigated and recorded as
               probable rabies cases in Oriental Mindoro Province, and 28 animal cases were confirmed with DFA. Death
               investigations, conducted by a team of PHO and/or DOH staff, involved clinical diagnosis using hospital
               records and interviews with medical staff and the patient’s family. No samples were collected for testing.
               Deaths ranged in age from 4 to 69 years (median = 37 years), with 6 (25%) being under 15 years old and a
               male:female ratio of 1.08:1. Exposure events leading to human infection then death were concentrated in 8
               of the 15 municipalities [Figure 3B], with 64% occurring in just three municipalities (Bongabong-6,
               Mansalay-5, and Pinamalayan-5). The most densely populated area, the capital city of Calapan, had zero
               human rabies deaths but had two animal cases confirmed over the study period.

               For all reported human rabies cases, the biting animal was a dog. Of the confirmed animal cases, 54%
               (15/28) were found in three municipalities (Baco-7, Mansalay-4, and Puerto Galera-4), of which two (Baco
               and Puerto Galera) reported zero human rabies deaths during the study period. None of the human cases
               received PEP prior to displaying symptoms of rabies infection. As per PHO death investigation reports,
               primary reasons for not seeking PEP after exposure events included: a lack of awareness of the risk of rabies
               from animal bites, the choice to consult traditional healers for treatment (known as tandok/tawak in the
               Philippines), and financial constraints preventing the ability to cover travel costs and take time off work to
               seek PEP, particularly for those in remote locations relying on agricultural work.
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53