Page 17 - Read Online
P. 17

Walker. Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation 2020;7:194-214  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-8659.2020.09               Page 195

               markers of microglia with expression profiles that do not definitively fall into the pro-inflammatory or anti-
               inflammatory classification. These additional markers include triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2,
               CD33 and progranulin, identified from genetic findings, colony stimulating factor-1 receptor, purinergic receptor
               P2RY12, CD68 and Toll-like receptors. Further directions will be considered for addressing crucial issues.

               Keywords: Neuropathology, RNA-sequencing, TREM2, microglia, activation states, immunohistochemistry



               INTRODUCTION
               Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD) have become the most significant and feared brain
               diseases of elderly populations who are now enjoying longer lifespans due to more effective treatments
               for cancer, cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. AD is the most common cause of cognitive decline and
                                          [1]
               dementia in elderly populations , while PD can lead to severe loss of mobility and independence, amongst
                           [2]
               other features . Both diseases are significant causes of morbidity in elderly populations and share many
               common pathological features involving the accumulation of aggregated proteins. In AD, it is extracellular
                                                                                        [3]
               amyloid and neurofibrillary-associated phosphorylated tau neurites and tangles , while in PD, it is
                                                                                          [4]
               aggregated/phosphorylated alpha-synuclein accumulated into pathological inclusions . These diseases
               are distinctive on account of the degenerative changes occurring in different brain regions; however, one
               common feature is the appearance of “activated” microglia within brain regions showing degenerative
               changes. Inflammation has become one of the targets being investigated as treatment strategies for these
               diseases, and the importance of studying microglia in relation to many different brain diseases is widely
                         [5-7]
               appreciated .

               Initial antibody-based observations on “activated” microglia in postmortem brain tissues were made
               30 years ago and gave rise to the inflammatory hypotheses for neurodegeneration. This is illustrated in
               Figure 1 and suggests that initial cell death or accumulation of aberrant/aggregated proteins [amyloid
               beta (Aβ), tau or alpha-synuclein (α-syn)] results in proinflammatory activation of microglia, causing the
               production of toxic and/or inflammatory cytokines. The resulting neurotoxicity would then accelerate
               further inflammation, thus exacerbating the neurodegenerative process. These concepts developed in the
               80’s and 90’s might now be considered imprecise based on more recent findings. However, it was from this
               hypothesis that treatments for AD and PD with anti-inflammatory agents were developed and tested. This
               approach was supported by data from epidemiological studies that patients who had long-term usage of
               anti-inflammatory drugs for inflammatory conditions such as arthritis, had less dementia, which appeared
                                                       [8]
               to support the inflammatory hypothesis of AD . However, although many anti-inflammatory compounds
               and strategies have proven effective in AD animal models, clinical trials of AD patients have generally
                                       [9]
               shown no significant effect . The purpose of this review is to consider the approaches used to define
               changes in microglial phenotypes and neuroinflammation in brain tissue, and discuss how the role of
               microglia in neurodegeneration should be considered in light of a wider range of markers identified from
               recent transcriptional profiling of microglia. The focus of this review will be on studies relating to AD, but
               many of the concepts might be applicable to PD, multiple sclerosis (MS) or stroke. The aim for this review
               is to bridge the gap between the studies that have analyzed transcription in large numbers of samples or
               isolated cells with in situ studies in human brain samples with antibodies to define the microenvironments
               of microglia in the specialized neuroanatomy of the human brain [10-12] . Ultimately, the best way to define
               the microglia responsible for damaging inflammation in brain samples will be with a single or small panel
               of markers that can be studied reliably in widely available types of pathological brain samples.


               METHODOLOGY FOR INVESTIGATING MICROGLIAL PHENOTYPES
               Antibody-based methodology for in situ localization of microglial antigens
                                                             [13]
               Pioneering observations on microglia by Rio-Hortega  used traditional metal-based histological stains to
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22