Page 394 - Read Online
P. 394

Page 6 of 16               Pearce et al. Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation 2018;5:47  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-8659.2018.46


               Table 2. Progress using natural killer cells against cancer clinical trials
               Identifier              Trial name             Treatment    Phase         Diagnosis
               NCT03383978  Intracranial injection of NK- 92/5.28.z (HER2.  NK-92/5.28.z (HER2.  I  GBM
                            taNK) cells in patients with recurrent HER2-  taNK) injection
                            positive GBM (Quilt 3.C001) (CAR2BRAIN)
               NCT00909558  Safety and effectiveness study of autologous NK   Autologous NK/NK   I  Glioma, squamous cell lung cancer,
                            and NK T-cells on cancer        T-cell immunotherapy   pancreatic cancer, colon cancer
               NCT00823524  Donor NK cells after donor stem cell transplant   Donor NK cell infusion  I/II  Brain and central nervous system
                            in treating patients with advanced cancer              tumors
               NCT03081780  Open label NK cell infusion (FATE-NK100) with   FATE-NK100  I  Refractory acute myelogenous
                            Subq IL-2 in adults with AML                           leukemia, relapsed AML
               NK: natural killer; GBM: glioblastoma multiforme; HER2: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; AML: acute myelogenous leukemia


               CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS
               Checkpoint inhibitors are a rapidly advancing field and involve the exploitation of tumor checkpoint
               regulators. Immune checkpoints regulate the life cycle of the cellular immune response by either activation
               of signals or by inhibition of activating processes. Tumor checkpoint regulators are mechanisms by which
               tumors evade immune system recognition through expression of neoantigens. These antigens emulate those
                             [39]
               of healthy tissue . Checkpoint inhibition blocks tumor cell evasion and allows for T-cells to overcome the
               immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. However, clinical trial outcomes and patient responses differ
               between cancer types. Thus, investigation of external influences on checkpoint mechanisms ought to be
               further explored.


               Inhibitors generated for therapeutic use are found as chemically synthesized monoclonal antibodies or
               recombinant forms of ligands or receptors. Such checkpoint targets include the programmed death receptor 1
               (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) receptor and its
               ligands CD80 and CD86. These pathways are responsible for restriction of T-cells in peripheral tissues during
               inflammatory response or for down-regulation of co-stimulatory T-cells, respectively [40-42] . Although the
               PD-1 and CTLA-4 pathways are not the only mechanisms which provide cancer cells protection from T-cell
               surveillance, PD-1 and CTLA-4 have exhibited profound outcomes in regard to tumor regression, appear to
               possess an immunodominant role as compared to other immune checkpoints, and their mechanisms are the
               most understood. It has been shown that PD-L1 is highly expressed on tumor cells and that coordination
                                                +
                                                               [43]
               between PD-1/PD-L1 can inhibit CD8  T-cell function . Administration of PD-L1 inhibitors results in
               regression of a number of tumor types [44-49] . CTLA-4 blockade has shown efficacy in murine melanoma,
               prostate cancer, and pancreatic carcinoma studies [50,51] . The latter demonstrated particular success when
                                                                                          [52]
               combined with PD-1 inhibition, as survival was prolonged even after tumor rechallenge . This finding is
               applicable to cancer cells that remain concealed within the body following tumor resection.

               Despite checkpoint inhibitor success in various cancer types, use of this therapy against brain tumors has
               yet to be extensively pursued. Preclinical assessments in orthotopic, immunocompetent murine models have
               identified the most effective checkpoint pathway against GBM. When administered alone, PD-1 inhibition
               has a 50% long term survival rate in mice. Combined treatment with PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibition was
                                                   [53]
               found to achieve 75% long term survival . These results paralleled those found in a melanoma clinical
                                                                                           [54]
               trial that utilized the same combination of inhibitors, indicating improved effectiveness . Furthermore,
               checkpoint inhibitor OX-2 glycoprotein (CD200) has been found to be highly expressed in a number of
                                                                                           [55]
               human brain tissue samples, including astrocytomas, meningiomas, and GBM tumors . This pathway
               has been investigated in canine models with high-grade gliomas. Although CD200 canine clinical trials
               are still ongoing, regression of tumors and absence of inhibitor toxicity has indicated therapeutic promise,
               and treated groups have already demonstrated an increase of 615 days of survival as compared to control
                      [56]
               subjects . Another pursuit made to target meningioma and other rare CNS tumors is an ongoing, Phase II
   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399