Page 35 - Read Online
P. 35

Horwell et al. Microbiome Res Rep 2025;4:1    https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/mrr.2024.32  Page 13 of 20

               consistently breastfeeding has the largest effect size. Moreover, the available evidence suggests that as a
               single variable, it provides a significant and long-lasting health benefit to the infant. After breastfeeding
               stops, other environmental cues, such as diet, geography, and exposure to soil, start to influence the
               microbiome to a greater degree. This period of early life, the window of opportunity, appears key to priming
               the immune system and avoiding chronic inflammatory states in later life. These modifiable variables show
               growing promise for future clinical utility for a microbiome-based public health intervention. As our
               methodology improves, higher resolution analysis should make it possible to dissect specific strain-level
               configurations as well as the non-bacterial species of the microbiome, and the ecosystems they originate
               from, to enable us to fully understand how the microbiome influences the normal development of the
               immune and metabolic systems in humans.



             DECLARATIONS
             Authors’ contributions
             Conceptualization, writing - original draft, visualization: Horwell E
             Writing - review & editing: Bearn P, Cutting SM

             Availability of data and materials
             Not applicable.


             Financial support and sponsorship
             This work was supported by funding from the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) under grant number
             (MR/R026262/1 to Cutting SM). The doctoral fellowship of Dr Edward Horwell was paid for by Ashford
             and St Peter’s NHS Foundation Trust (UK).

             Conflicts of interest
             Cutting SM is the CEO of SporeGen Ltd and has no financial gain in this publication. There are no other
             conflicts of interest to declare.


             Ethical approval and consent to participate
             Not applicable.


             Consent for publication
             Not applicable.

             Copyright
             © The Author(s) 2024.

               REFERENCES
               1.       Whipps JM, Lewis K, Cooke RC. Mycoparasitism and plant disease control. In: Burge MN, editors. Fungi in biological control
                    systems. Manchester University Press; 1988.p.161-187. Available from: https://books.google.com/books?hl=zh-CN&lr=&id=
                    qoK7AAAAIAAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=Fungi+in+biological+control+systems&ots=ZGZywqBQQc&sig=
                    SF3yncFR8kM6WBVld-jY1Ymmxec#v=onepage&q=Fungi%20in%20biological%20control%20systems&f=false. [Last accessed on
                    13 Sep 2024].
               2.       Berg G, Rybakova D, Fischer D, et al. Microbiome definition re-visited: old concepts and new challenges. Microbiome 2020;8:103.
                    DOI  PubMed  PMC
               3.       Ursell LK, Metcalf JL, Parfrey LW, Knight R. Defining the human microbiome. Nutr Rev 2012;70 Suppl 1:S38-44.  DOI  PubMed
                    PMC
               4.       Grice EA, Segre JA. The skin microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol 2011;9:244-53.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               5.       Morowitz MJ, Carlisle EM, Alverdy JC. Contributions of intestinal bacteria to nutrition and metabolism in the critically ill. Surg Clin
                    North Am 2011;91:771-85.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40