Page 130 - Read Online
P. 130

Wang et al. Microbiome Res Rep. 2025;4:23  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/mrr.2024.94  Page 15 of 19

               Among the various spike-in absolute quantification methods, using extracted DNA as a spike-in instead of
               directly adding cells to fecal samples offers significant advantages. This approach eliminates biases
               associated with cell lysis efficiency and DNA extraction recovery [49,50] , ensuring more reliable quantification.
               Additionally, for samples with pre-extracted DNA, quantification can begin directly from the DNA,
               bypassing the need for additional sample preparation steps. Compared to spike-in synthetic DNA
               sequences, which may introduce artificial background noise or biases in bioinformatic analyses during
               sequencing , using authentic biological DNA, such as marine bacterial DNA, better mimics human gut
                         [18]
               microbiome DNA. This reduces potential interference caused by sequence discrepancies and enhances the
               accuracy of microbial community profiling.


               The use of copy number as a standard can result in amplification efficiency errors during 16S rRNA
                                                          [51]
               sequencing, affecting total copy number estimation . This issue is particularly pronounced in samples with
               a high abundance of high-copy-number bacteria. However, this impact should be minimized in shotgun
               in absolute abundance analysis (F = 6.3) suggests that the relative abundance analysis exhibits a slightly
               sequencing, as it involves shearing DNA rather than amplification [51,52] .

               The observed shifts in genus rankings between relative and absolute quantification [Figure 4C-E] are driven
               by both total microbial load differences and individual taxon variation, with total load playing the primary
               role. This effect is particularly evident between infant and mother samples, where mothers had significantly
               higher total bacterial counts, amplifying the contribution of dominant maternal genera in absolute terms.
               For instance, while Bifidobacterium appeared dominant in infants based on relative abundance, its absolute
               copy number was comparable between infants and mothers, indicating a load-driven distortion. In contrast,
               Escherichia-Shigella remained significantly more abundant in infants even after normalization, reflecting
               true taxon-specific enrichment. These results underscore the importance of absolute quantification in
               disentangling microbial abundance from compositional bias. Without adjusting for total load, key ecological
               signals may be obscured or misrepresented in relative abundance–based analysis.

               When comparing relative abundance with absolute abundance after spike-in processing, it was found that
               Veillonella, Streptococcus, and Enterobacter are no longer among the top 10 in the absolute quantification.
               Veillonella's biofilm-forming ability , Streptococcus’s transformation capability , and Enterobacter's drug
                                             [53]
                                                                                   [54]
                               [55]
               efflux mechanisms  confer antibiotic resistance to these genera. Consequently, when participants take
               antibiotics, the total number of bacterial cells decreases , and antibiotic-resistant genera become more
                                                                [56]
                                                                                             [16]
               prominent in relative quantification analyses. This finding is consistent with previous studies .
               The F value in both analyses indicates the ratio of the variance between the groups to the variance within
               the groups . The slightly higher F value in the relative abundance analysis (F = 6.6) compared to the spike-
                        [57]
               greater distinction between the mother and infant microbiomes. This difference in F values may be
               attributed to the inherent variability and potential biases in relative abundance measures, which can
               sometimes amplify differences between groups. In contrast, the spike-in method aims to reduce such biases
               by providing an absolute quantification, potentially leading to a more accurate but slightly lower F value.


               This interpretation is further supported by taxonomic patterns observed in Figure 4, where high-biomass
               maternal taxa such as Blautia and Coprococcus and infant-associated taxa like Escherichia-Shigella and
               Bifidobacterium largely drove the separation in both relative and absolute β-diversity plots. Genera like
               Veillonella, although prominent in relative terms, were low in absolute abundance and contributed less to
               the spike-in–based analysis. The similar PCoA clustering patterns and consistent variance explained across
               PC1 and PC2 further support that absolute β-diversity reflects the same underlying biological differences -
   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135