Page 21 - Read Online
P. 21

Mueller et al. Microbiome Res Rep 2024;3:33  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/mrr.2024.09  Page 15 of 18

               phylogroup is most strongly associated with the health benefit of interest. Additionally, if one or more
               phylogroups of Akkermansia are determined to be negatively associated with health outcomes in a
               particular context, knowing what strains to avoid during therapeutic development will decrease the risk of
               failure or development of adverse effects.


               Our study presents certain limitations. First, the novel species described in our analysis of the Akkermansia
               pangenome are relatively rare in the human populations we have characterized and appear to be present in
               lower abundance than other Akkermansia species. There are currently only five isolates of A. ignis and two
               of A. durhamii. Two strains, BAA-2860 and CSUN-56, may also represent novel species. Prescreening of
               MAGs generated from metagenomic sequencing of fresh stool samples would allow for more efficient,
               targeted isolation of these rare species. The functional characterization of Akkermansia strain by standard
               methods like the API 20A system is of limited use as the composition of the assay medium is not compatible
               with culturing Akkermansia. Indeed, the species identification table provided by bioMérieux does not
               include Akkermansia. There are also some limitations to the use of StrainR in reliably distinguishing
               between the A. muciniphila AmIa and AmIb subspecies.

               Finally, the rarity of the non-A. muciniphila species can decrease the statistical power of any  associations
               between these species and human health conditions. As illustrated in cases of pediatric obesity, the
               proportion of individuals with a detectable level of A. biwaensis was low, which, compounded with the low
               prevalence of these new species compared to A. muciniphila, makes determining relevant disease
               associations more challenging. Thus, much larger datasets will be necessary to properly investigate the
               importance of these new Akkermansia species to human health.

               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Conception, data acquisition, data analysis and interpretation, and writing: Mueller KD
               Akkermansia isolation and genome sequencing: Davey L, Panzetta ME
               Research guidance and manuscript revision: Valdivia RH
               Manuscript revision: Rawls JF, McCann JR, Flores GE

               Availability of data and materials
               Genomes retrieved from NCBI and their accession numbers are listed in Supplementary Table 1. 16S and
               metagenomic datasets for method validation were provided by the POMMS . Metagenomic sequencing
                                                                                 [40]
               samples  case  studies  were  obtained  from  the  SRA  using  Bioproject  accessions  PRJNA398089,
               PRJNA400072, PRJEB42151, PRJEB42155, PRJNA751792, and PRJNA782662     [41-44] . Sequences for the
               Akkermansia durhamii isolates have been deposited in GenBank under BioProject accession number
               PRJNA1066260.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               The work described here was supported by NIH grants (AI42376 to R.H.V and R24-DK110492 to Rawls JF).
               Additional support from the HHMI EPI program to Valdivia RH and Flores GE was provided by the
               National Institutes of Health through the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) (grant
               number SC1GM136546). Mueller KD was partially supported by the National Science Foundation under
               Grant Number DGE 1545220.

               Conflicts of interest
               Valdivia RH is a co-founder of Bloom Sciences (San Diego, CA). The company was not involved in
               sponsoring or analyzing and interpreting the data presented. Other authors declared that there are no
               conflicts of interest.
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26