Page 37 - Read Online
P. 37

Page 2 of 17                  Wang et al. Microbiome Res Rep 2024;3:39  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/mrr.2024.21

               Compared to DDA, DIA-PASEF identified more microbial peptides, quantified more proteins with fewer missing
               values, and recovered more small antimicrobial proteins. We did not observe any obvious impacts of protein
               digestion methods on both taxonomic and functional profiles. However, differential centrifugation decreased the
               recovery of small and antimicrobial proteins, biased the taxonomic observation with a marked overestimation of
               Muribaculum species, and altered the measured functional compositions of metaproteome.

               Conclusion: This study underscores the critical impact of experimental choices on metaproteomic outcomes and
               sheds  light  on  the  potential  biases  introduced  at  different  stages  of  the  workflow.  The  comprehensive
               methodological comparisons serve as a valuable guide for researchers aiming to enhance the accuracy and
               completeness of metaproteomic analyses.
               Keywords: Fecal metaproteomics, microbiome, mass spectrometry, differential centrifugation




               INTRODUCTION
               The human gut microbiome contains an estimated 100 trillion microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi,
               protozoa, and viruses, which interact with each other and their host to foster a complex and dynamic
               environment . The symbiotic host-microbial relationship of the gut microbiome is crucial to human
                          [1-3]
                                                                                                   [4]
               health and contributes to many biological processes, such as metabolism, immunomodulation, etc. . Many
               studies also suggest that microbiome dysbiosis is correlated with and may lead to the development of
               neurodegenerative, cardiovascular, metabolic, and gastrointestinal diseases, among others [3,5-7] . With the
               emerging importance of the gut microbiome in human health, disease, and therapeutics, studies on the
                                                                              [8]
               microbiome, its taxa, and its products have become increasingly significant .

               Given the extremely high complexity of the microbiome, meta-omics approaches including metagenomics,
               metatranscriptomics, metabolomics, and metaproteomics, are commonly used in studying the microbiome
               composition and functions [9,10] . Among the different omics approaches, metaproteomics uses a mass
               spectrometer to directly measure the protein expressions and post-translational modifications (PTMs) of
                                     [11]
               the microbial community . Mass spectrometry (MS) analysis can be conducted with a data-dependent
               acquisition (DDA) or data-independent acquisition (DIA) strategy. DDA-based metaproteomics is
               commonly used due to its easy setup and analysis, flexibility, breadth of detection, and ability to relatively
                                               [12]
               quantify chemically labeled peptides . In a DDA mode, the most abundant ions from MS1 scan will be
               selected and fragmented during tandem MS scans; however, this data acquisition mode can risk losing
               information on the other less abundant peptides, particularly in complex samples such as microbiomes,
               which limits the depth, sensitivity, and reproducibility of metaproteomic data [13,14] . Contrastingly, DIA can
               sample all the peptides within the selected mass range and, therefore, theoretically can detect lower-
               abundance peptides in complex samples . In the past few years, the application of DIA-MS-based
                                                    [15]
               proteomics was profoundly expanded due to these advantages, the advancement of bioinformatics tools,
               such as DIA-NN , and advanced instrumental developments, such as timsTOF Pro  and Astral MS
                              [16]
                                                                                          [17]
               analyzer . More recently, the application of DIA-MS in metaproteomics has been reported, demonstrating
                      [18]
               great potential in increasing the depth of identification and accuracy of quantifications [19-21] .
               One advantage of metaproteomics is the capability to measure non-bacterial components, including
               proteins originating from the host, as well as viral, fungal and archaeal species, without the need for
               additional experimental efforts . This is particularly ideal for trans-kingdom, host-microbiome interaction
                                         [22]
               studies [23,24] . The intestinal lumen is the home of diverse biotic and abiotic components, including host-
               secreted proteins such as antimicrobial proteins and proteins produced by microbes themselves, such as
               small microbial proteins. These small proteins/polypeptides, including a high proportion of antimicrobial
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42