Page 32 - Read Online

Page 18 of 18 Yakovleva et al. Microbiome Res Rep 2024;3:19 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/mrr.2023.56

Drosophila melanogaster. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2020;75:1431-8. DOI PubMed PMC
37. Stamps JA, Yang LH, Morales VM, Boundy-Mills KL. Drosophila regulate yeast density and increase yeast community similarity in a
natural substrate. PLoS One 2012;7:e42238. DOI PubMed PMC
38. Becher PG, Flick G, Rozpędowska E, et al. Yeast, not fruit volatiles mediate Drosophila melanogaster attraction, oviposition and
development. Funct Ecol 2012;26:822-8. DOI
39. Reuter M, Bell G, Greig D. Increased outbreeding in yeast in response to dispersal by an insect vector. Curr Biol 2007;17:R81-3. DOI
PubMed
40. Coluccio AE, Rodriguez RK, Kernan MJ, Neiman AM. The yeast spore wall enables spores to survive passage through the digestive
tract of Drosophila. PLoS One 2008;3:e2873. DOI PubMed PMC
41. Ivnitsky SB, Maximova IA, Panchenko PL, et al. Microbiome affects the adaptation of Drosophila melanogaster to a high NaCl
concentration. Biol Bull Rev 2019;9:465-74. DOI
42. Dmitrieva AS, Ivnitsky SB, Maksimova IA, Panchenko PL, Kachalkin AV, Markov AV. Yeasts affect tolerance of Drosophila
melanogaster to food substrate with high NaCl concentration. PLoS One 2019;14:e0224811. DOI PubMed PMC
43. Dmitrieva AS, Maksimova IA, Kachalkin AV, Markov AV. Age-related changes in the yeast component of the Drosophila
melanogaster microbiome. Microbiology 2021;90:229-36. DOI
44. Dmitrieva AS, Yakovleva EY, Maksimova IA, Belov AA, Markov AV. Changes in the symbiotic yeast of Drosophila melanogaster
during adaptation to substrates with an increased NaCl content. Biol Bull Rev 2023;13:1-8. DOI
45. Panchenko PL, Kornilova MB, Perfilieva KS, Markov AV. Contribution of symbiotic microbiota to adaptation of Drosophila
melanogaster to an unfavorable growth medium. Biol Bull Russ Acad Sci 2017;44:345-54. DOI
46. Dmitrieva AS, Ivnitsky SB, Markov AV. Adaptation of Drosophila melanogaster to unfavorable feed substrate is accompanied by
expansion of trophic niche. Biol Bull Rev 2017;7:369-79. DOI
47. Belkina EG, Naimark EB, Gorshkova AA, Markov AV. Does adaptation to different diets result in assortative mating? Ambiguous
results from experiments on Drosophila. J Evol Biol 2018;31:1803-14. DOI PubMed
48. Marchesi JR, Sato T, Weightman AJ, et al. Design and evaluation of useful bacterium-specific PCR primers that amplify genes coding
for bacterial 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 1998;64:795-9. DOI PubMed PMC
49. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol
1991;173:697-703. DOI PubMed PMC
50. DeLong EF. Archaea in coastal marine environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89:5685-9. DOI PubMed PMC
51. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In: Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematic. New York: Wiley; 1991. pp. 115-75.
Available from: https://search.worldcat.org/title/nucleic-acid-techniques-in-bacterial-systematics/oclc/22310197. [Last accessed on 27
Feb 2024].
52. Hugerth LW, Wefer HA, Lundin S, et al. DegePrime, a program for degenerate primer design for broad-taxonomic-range PCR in
microbial ecology studies. Appl Environ Microbiol 2014;80:5116-23. DOI PubMed PMC
53. Merkel AY, Tarnovetskii IY, Podosokorskaya OA, Toshchakov SV. Analysis of 16S rRNA primer systems for profiling of
thermophilic microbial communities. Microbiology 2019;88:671-80. DOI
54. Vortsepneva E, Chevaldonné P, Klyukina A, et al. Microbial associations of shallow-water Mediterranean marine cave Solenogastres
(Mollusca). PeerJ 2021;9:e12655. DOI PubMed PMC
55. Gavrilov SN, Korzhenkov AA, Kublanov IV, et al. Microbial communities of polymetallic deposits’ acidic ecosystems of continental
climatic zone with high temperature contrasts. Front Microbiol 2019;10:1573. DOI PubMed PMC
56. Shannon CE, Weaver W. The mathematical theory of communication. Available from: https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_2383164/
component/file_2383163/content. [Last accessed on 27 Feb 2024].
57. Vainshtein BA. On some methods for assessing the similarity of biocenoses. Some Methods Assess Similarity Biocenoses
1976;46:981-6. (in Russian)
58. Praet J, Cnockaert M, Meeus I, Smagghe G, Vandamme P. Gilliamella intestini sp. nov., Gilliamella bombicola sp. nov., Gilliamella
bombi sp. nov. and Gilliamella mensalis sp. nov.: four novel Gilliamella species isolated from the bumblebee gut. Syst Appl Microbiol
2017;40:199-204. DOI PubMed
59. Galac MR, Lazzaro BP. Comparative pathology of bacteria in the genus Providencia to a natural host, Drosophila melanogaster.
Microbes Infect 2011;13:673-83. DOI PubMed PMC
60. Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T. The yeasts: a taxonomic study. Elsevier; 2011. Available from: https://books.google.ru/books?hl=
ru&lr=&id=yfg79rlIFIkC&oi=fnd&pg=PP2&ots=M0J-mwIryn&sig=dR-yEY7bsr-y7BLCvcRgG7iU0-s&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&
q&f=false. [Last accessed on 27 Feb 2024].
61. Rattray FP, Eppert I. Cheese | Secondary cultures. In: Encyclopedia of dairy sciences. Elsevier; 2011. pp. 567-73. Available from:
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780123744074000686. [Last accessed on 27 Feb 2024].
62. Koňuchová M, Valík Ľ. Modelling the radial growth of Geotrichum candidum: effects of temperature and water activity.
Microorganisms 2021;9:532. DOI PubMed PMC