Page 563 - Read Online
P. 563

Page 10 of 13  Maurina et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2021;5:53  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2021.88


 Table 2. On-going trials. Adapted and modified from the 2020 EHRA/EAPCI expert consensus statement update on catheter-based left atrial appendage occlusion [12]

                                                                        Estimated primary
      Patients
 Trial name  Summary  Device  Intervention  Primary outcome(s)  Status  and study
      enrolled
                                                                        completion date
 ANDES  8 weeks OAC vs. APT for the   Not specified  DOAC vs. clopidogrel + aspirin  350  2-month DRT  Recruiting  September 2022 to
 prevention of DRT                                                      September 2025
 ASAP-TOO  WATCHMAN vs. SAPT/no   WATCHMAN  LAAO + ATT vs. unspecified APT  482  7-day device/procedural safety and time to first  Active, not   December 2025 to
 treatment in NVAF patients with a   event of SSE          recruiting   December 2025
 contraindication to OAC
 STROKE-  LAAO vs. medical therapy for   Amulet  LAAO + 45 days of DAPT + ≥ 6   750  Composite of SSE bleeding and all-cause   Recruiting  May 2022 to May
 CLOSE  stroke prevention in NVAF after   months of SAPT vs. OAC, DOAC,   mortality up to 5 years  2030
 intracranial hemorrhage  SAPT, DAPT, no therapy
 SAFE-LAAC  Short vs. extended post-  Amulet  (1) 30 days vs. 6 months of DAPT   160  Composite of SSE, TIA, non-fatal MI, CV, and   Recruiting  January 2021 to
 implantation DAPT and 6 months   (randomized)   all-cause mortality, moderate-severe bleeding,   January 2022
 of APT vs. long-term SAPT  (2) 6 months of APT vs. longer SAPT   and LAA thrombosis
 (not randomized)

 CLOSURE-AF  LAAO vs. (D)OAC for stroke   CE-mark approved  LAOO + APT vs. (D)OAC  1512  Survival time free of SSE, major bleeding, and   Recruiting  February 2021 to
 prevention in NVAF  LAAO devices  CV or unexplained death              February 2023
 Occlusion-AF  LAAO vs. DOAC for stroke   Amulet or   LAAO vs. DOAC  750  Composite of SSE major bleeding and all-cause  Recruiting  February 2024 to
 prevention in NVAF  WATCHMAN  mortality up to 5 years                  October 2030

 SWISS-APERO Amulet vs. WATCHMAN FLX  Amulet or   AMPLATZER Amulet vs.   200  Composite of LAA patency at 45 days and the   Active, not   July 2021 to May 2026
 WATCHMAN FLX WATCHMAN/FLX  crossover from one device to the other during   recruiting
                  device implantation
 WATCH-  Medical therapy vs. WATCHMAN  WATCHMAN  TAVR + medical therapy vs. TAVR +  350  Composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, and   Active, not   November 2022 to
 TAVR  in patients with NVAF undergoing   WATCHMAN  bleeding  recruiting  November 2022
 TAVR
 TAVI/LAA   Medical therapy vs. LAAO in   Not specified  TAVR + medical therapy vs. TAVR +  80  Embolic events, major bleeding, and CV   Active, not   May 2023 to May
 occlusion  patients with NVAF undergoing   LAAO  mortality  recruiting  2023
 TAVR
 CHAMPION-  WATCHMAN FLX as an   WATCHMAN FLX WATCHMAN vs. DOAC  3000  Non-inferiority for SSE and CV death at 36   Recruiting  December 2025 to
 AF  alternative to DOAC  months, non-inferiority for SSE at 60 months,   December 2027
                  and superiority for non-procedural bleeding

 OAC: Oral anticoagulant; CV: cardiovascular; DOAC: direct OAC; DRT: device-related thrombosis; APT: antiplatelet therapy; SAPT: single APT; DAPT: double APT; ATT: antithrombotic therapy; LAAO: left atrial
 appendage occlusion; MI: myocardial infarction; NVAF: non-valvular atrial fibrillation; SSE: stroke or systemic embolism; TAVR: transcatheter aortic valve replacement.



 CONCLUSION

 LAAO could be an alternative to anticoagulation in patients with non-valvular AF. While only two devices (WATCHMAN and AMULET) are both CE
 marked and FDA approved, other devices are commercially available in Europe, with high procedural success and a low rate of complications.
   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568