Page 366 - Read Online
P. 366

Bianchi et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2021;5:37  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2021.64  Page 11 of 11

               REFERENCES
               1.       Campbell S, Uzzo RG, Allaf ME, et al. Renal mass and localized renal cancer: AUA guideline. J Urol 2017;198:520-9.  DOI  PubMed
               2.       Cacciamani GE, Medina LG, Gill T, et al. Impact of surgical factors on robotic partial nephrectomy outcomes: comprehensive
                   systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol 2018;200:258-74.  DOI  PubMed
               3.       Ghani KR, Sukumar S, Sammon JD, Rogers CG, Trinh QD, Menon M. Practice patterns and outcomes of open and minimally invasive
                   partial nephrectomy since the introduction of robotic partial nephrectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. J Urol
                   2014;191:907-12.  DOI  PubMed
               4.       Benway BM, Wang AJ, Cabello JM, Bhayani SB. Robotic partial nephrectomy with sliding-clip renorrhaphy: technique and outcomes.
                   Eur Urol 2009;55:592-9.  DOI  PubMed
               5.       Patel MN, Kaul SA, Laungani R, et al. Retroperitoneal robotic renal surgery: technique and early results. J Robot Surg 2009;3:1.  DOI
                   PubMed
               6.       Ghani KR, Porter J, Menon M, Rogers C. Robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy: a step-by-step guide. BJU Int 2014;114:311-3.
                   DOI  PubMed
               7.       Dell'Oglio P, De Naeyer G, Xiangjun L, et al; ERUS Educational Working Group and the YAU working group on robot-assisted
                   surgery. The impact of surgical strategy in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: is it beneficial to treat anterior tumours with
                   transperitoneal access and posterior tumours with retroperitoneal access? Eur Urol Oncol 2021;4:112-6.  DOI  PubMed
               8.       Porpiglia F, Mari A, Amparore D, et al; RECORD 2 Project. Transperitoneal vs retroperitoneal minimally invasive partial
                   nephrectomy: comparison of perioperative outcomes and functional follow-up in a large multi-institutional cohort (The RECORD 2
                   Project). Surg Endosc 2020.  DOI  PubMed
               9.       Feliciano J, Stifelman M. Robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy: a four-arm approach. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 2012;16:208-
                   11.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               10.      Hu JC, Treat E, Filson CP, et al. Technique and outcomes of robot-assisted retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter
                   study. Eur Urol 2014;66:542-9.  DOI  PubMed
               11.      Gettman M, Blute M, Chow G, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and
                   initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. Urology 2004;64:914-8.  DOI  PubMed
               12.      Singh I. Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: current review of the technique and literature. J Minim Access Surg
                   2009;5:87-92.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               13.      Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1370-1.  DOI  PubMed
               14.      Gaur DD, Agarwal DK, Purohit KC. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 1993;149:103-5.  DOI
                   PubMed
               15.      Harke NN, Darr C, Radtke JP, et al. Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter matched-pair
                   analysis. Eur Urol Focus 2020;S2405-4569(20)30254.  DOI  PubMed
               16.      Marconi L, Challacombe B. Robotic partial nephrectomy for posterior renal tumours: retro or transperitoneal approach? Eur Urol
                   Focus 2018;4:632-5.  DOI  PubMed
               17.      Stroup SP, Hamilton ZA, Marshall MT, et al. Comparison of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy for
                   pentafecta perioperative and renal functional outcomes. World J Urol 2017;35:1721-8.  DOI  PubMed
               18.      Choo SH, Lee SY, Sung HH, et al. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: matched-pair comparisons by
                   nephrometry scores. World J Urol 2014;32:1523-9.  DOI  PubMed
               19.      Hu JC, Treat E, Filson CP, et al. Technique and outcomes of robot-assisted retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter
                   study. Eur Urol 2014;66:542-9.  DOI  PubMed
               20.      Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size,
                   location and depth. J Urol 2009;182:844-53.  DOI  PubMed
               21.      Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S, et al. Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal
                   tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 2009;56:786-93.  DOI  PubMed
               22.      Mittakanti HR, Heulitt G, Li HF, Porter JR. Transperitoneal vs. retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a matched-paired analysis.
                   World J Urol 2020;38:1093-9.  DOI  PubMed
               23.      Maurice MJ, Ramirez D, Kaouk JH. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site retroperitioneal renal surgery: initial investigation of a
                   purpose-built single-port surgical system. Eur Urol 2017;71:643-7.  DOI  PubMed
   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371