Page 31 - Read Online
P. 31

Page 8 of 12                                     Ugliono et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2021;5:2  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2020.93

               Table 1. Outcomes of laparoscopic gastropexy in paraesophageal hernia treatment
               Authors         Year  n   GP (n)  Associated   Recurrences (%)  Mortality (%)  Follow-up   Notes
                                               procedures (n)                      (months)
               Agwunobi et al. [61]  1998  13 HR  13      14.4% symptomatic  7.7     10    15.4% conversions
               Hawasli et al. [62]  1998  27  25  MC = 25  0%               0        1-56  22.2% reflux
               Van der Peet et al. [63]  2000  19  19  SC = 17  15.8% radiological  0  24  15.8% conversions
                                                 MC = 2                                    75% reflux esophagitis
                                                 FP = 15                                   without FP
               Ponsky et al. [64]  2003  28  28  FP = 28  0% radiological   0        12
               Diaz et al. [65]  2003  116  48   SC = 110  32% radiological  1.7     30    4.3% major
                                                 MC = 6                                    complications
                                                 FP = 114
                                                 EL = 6
               Horstmann et al. [66]  2004  16  16  MC = 16  0% radiological  0      14    6.25% conversions
                                                 FP = 16                                   31% pleural injury
               Poncet et al. [67]  2010  89  77  MC = 89  15.7% radiological   0     57.5  4.4% conversions
                                                 FP = 89                                   7.8% morbidity
               Daigle et al. [68]  2015  101  101  SC = 94  16.8% endoscopic/  0     10.9  22% morbidity
                                                          radiological                     29.7% reflux
               Yates et al. [69]  2015  11 HR  10  TG = 11  0% symptomatic  N/A      3     2 readmissions
                                                                                           2 TG dislocations
               Higashi et al. [70]  2017  8 HR  100       0% symptomatic    0%       48
               HR: high risk patients; GP: gastropexy; MC: mesh cruroplasty; SC: simple cruroplasty; FP: fundoplication; EL: esophageal lengthening;
               TG: tube gastrostomy

               The rationale for adding a fundoplication is twofold: treating preoperative GER symptoms and preventing
               the postoperative onset of GER. GER is a frequent clinical manifestation of PEH because the herniation
               through the diaphragmatic hiatus determines a functional incompetence of the lower esophageal
               sphincter (LES), favoring the reflux of the gastric contents. GER can also occur “de novo” postoperatively
               due to altered functional anatomy of the GEJ caused by extensive mediastinal dissection. Furthermore,
               fundoplication is thought to anchor the cardia below the diaphragm, contributing to the reduction in the
               rate of recurrences . For these reasons, some authors advocate the routine addition of a fundoplication to
                               [50]
                                                     [71]
               restore the functional competence of the LES .

               Other authors sustain the selective addition of fundoplication during PEH repair depending on the
               presence of preoperative GER or altered esophageal motility at esophageal manometry. They believe that
               the intra-abdominal reduction of PEH restores the normal anatomy of the EGJ, therefore no other anti-
                                                                         [72]
               reflux operations, with the consequent risk of dysphagia, are needed .
               However, the LES competence can be difficult to assess preoperatively, because esophageal manometry can
                                               [73]
               be unreliable in the presence of PEH . Furthermore, the incidence of dysphagia following fundoplication
                                           [74]
               is minimal in experienced hands .
               Müller-Stich et al.  performed a RCT comparing mesh-augmented hiatoplasty with or without the
                                [75]
               addition of a fundoplication. At 12-month follow-up, the fundoplication group had a significantly lower
               incidence of GER symptoms than hiatoplasty alone, and the subjective results were confirmed by objective
               upper endoscopy findings. Interestingly, the incidence of gas bloat and dysphagia did not differ between the
               two groups, leading the authors to favor the systematic addition of an anti-reflux procedure.

                                    [76]
               In addition, Furnée et al.  performed a comparative study of patients who underwent PEH repair with or
               without fundoplication. Of the 20 patients who did not receive fundoplication, new onset of esophagitis
               occurred in 28%, and pathological acid exposure was demonstrated in 39%. In the fundoplication group,
               8.7% of patients experienced dysphagia. The authors concluded that, since the rate of postoperative side
               effects of fundoplication is low, while objective evidence of postoperatively de novo onset of GER occurred
               frequently, the addition of a fundoplication should be recommended during PEH repair.
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36