Page 28 - Read Online
P. 28

Ugliono et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2021;5:2  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2020.93                                    Page 5 of 12



























                                               Figure 3. Identification of the hernia sac


                A                                             B























                               Figure 4. Paraesophageal hernia repair: (A) cruroplasty; and (B) total 360° fundoplication

               the correct plane of dissection, avoiding potential injuries to the neural and vascular adjacent structures;
               second, it reduces the risk of collections in the thoracic cavity; and third, since the hernia sac acts as a lead
               point that pushes the stomach back in the thoracic cavity, its excision reduces the risk of HH recurrence .
                                                                                                       [29]

               Crural closure: mesh vs. simple cruroplasty
               Closure of the diaphragmatic hiatus is mandatory during PEH repair. It can be achieved through
               several techniques, with primary closure or the use of a mesh. The prosthetic materials can be used as a
               reinforcement of a primary crural closure or as a “bridge” to close a wide diaphragmatic defect without
               any attempt to approximate the crural pillars. Moreover, some authors suggest performing crural relaxing
                                                        [30]
               incisions to achieve a tension-free crural closure .

               In the early laparoscopic series, simple primary cruroplasty was associated with an unacceptably high rate
               of recurrences at medium follow-up, described in up to 42% of patients .
                                                                           [31]
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33