Page 397 - Read Online
P. 397

Page 8 of 9                                              Brandolini. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:45  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2020.27

               DISCUSSION
               The aim of thymectomy in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) is the complete removal of the thymus
               and perithymic tissue to eradicate all immunogenic thymic cells and potentially viable thymic tissue in
               patients with MG to minimize disease persistence or increasing relapse rates. In cases of malignancy when
               a thymoma is diagnosed, it is still crucial to achieve radical en bloc excision of the residual thymic gland to
               improve both overall survival and the risk of local recurrence.

               With a left-sided approach for thymectomy, dissection of fat tissue in the right cardio-phrenic angle and
               within the confluence of the superior vena cava and innominate vein can be difficult, while the resection
               of the thymus gland with fat tissue in the left cardio-phrenic angle and at the level of the aorto-pulmonary
               window may be limited with a right-sided approach. On the contrary, the bilateral view improves the
               approach to the left innominate vein and offers a clear and close view of both phrenic nerves. Moreover, the
               bilateral view might be especially helpful in thymomas.


               An additional cervical incision within the neck may be helpful for a more extended excision of all residual
               thymus at the level of the upper cervical poles but in our experience, the bilateral VATS technique can
               safely achieve radical dissection of both superior thymic horns. Some sort of bilateral view, especially of the
               controlateral phrenic nerve, might be achieved by adding a sub-xyphoid port to the unilateral approach (see
               below).

               We believe that correct positioning of the trocars and the patient’s position are crucial to facilitate surgical
               dissection, avoid instrumental conflicts within the thorax and to reduce operating time. We routinely
               use an energy-based tissue sealing device during the whole procedure (ultrasound or radiofrequency are
               equivalent depending on personal experience and preference) for tissue handling, dissection and sealing
               vessels (Keynes veins).

                                                                                                        [11]
               Among the various minimally invasive approaches, the subxiphoid thymectomy described by Kido et al.
               in 1999 is gaining interest and popularity among thoracic surgeons. The two main advantages of this
               approach are reduction of postoperative pain and cosmetic results because of the small incisions (1 or
                                                                                                       [12]
               2 ports for access) and the possibility to avoid intercostal nerve damage. As shown by Suda et al. ,
               in comparison with a lateral VATS approach, the subxiphoid thymectomy is associated with reduced
               consumption of postoperative analgesics and perioperative blood loss. A similar operative time was
                                       [12]
               observed in the two groups . This technique seems to be able to overcome some technical difficulties of
               the VATS operation, such as the small working space, different viewpoint from a median sternotomy and
               bilateral phrenic nerve control. On the other hand, the subxiphoid approach is not widely used because of
               its unfamiliarity among thoracic surgeons and difficult intraoperative control of bleeding in the event of
               major vessel injury such as bleeding of the left innominate vein.

               The definition and indications for VATS thymectomy in the treatment of early-stage thymomas are
                                                     [13]
               summarized in the ITMIG reccomandations . Some authors disagree with a minimally invasive approach
               for large tumours because the dissection might be difficult and tumor manipulation might translate into
                                                                                      [14]
               intraoperative seeding of the pleural space, which would compromise the procedure .

               Nevertheless, some earlier studies comparing robotic-assisted thymectomy with trans-sternal thymectomy
               showed that large thymic tumors can be managed by the robotic approach, which has improved three-
               dimensional visualization, increased freedom of instrument motion for precise dissection and permits
               radical dissections, even of thymomas > 4 cm in diameter, while reducing the risk of capsular injury and
                                                                                                    [15]
               providing all the benefits in postoperative recovery of the minimally-invasive approach to the patient .
   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402