Page 61 - Read Online
P. 61

Yuu et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2019;3:6  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2018.73                                                 Page 3 of 9


               Table 1. Patient demographics of the LDG group and ODG group
                Variable                     LDG group (n = 20)       ODG group (n = 40)      P value
                Age (years)                      81.0 ± 5.0                 81.4 ± 3.9         0.289
                Sex, F/M                         5/15                       13/27              1
                BMI                              22.3 ± 3.4                 21.4 ± 3.0         0.289
                ASA                                                                            0.551
                   1                             2                          3
                   2                             15                         25
                   3                             3                          12
                Hugh-Jones classification                                                      0.117
                   1                             12                         13
                   2                             7                          16
                   3                             1                          9
                   4                             0                          2
                Previous surgeries               9                          9                  0.134
                CCI                                                                            0.566
                   0                             5                          6
                   1                             7                          10
                   2                             7                          16
                   3                             1                          6
                   4                             0                          2
               ASA: American Society of Anesthesiology; BMI: body mass index; CCI: Charlson comorbidity index; LDG: laparoscopic distal gastrectomy;
               ODG: open distal gastrectomy


               are especially critical in elderly patients, were included in the analysis.

               This study was approved by the institutional review board of the Bell Land General Hospital. The study
               protocol conformed to the principles set in the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.


               All statistical analysis were performed with EZR (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University; http://
               www.jichi.ac.jp/saitama-sct/SaitamaHP.files/statmedEN.html; Kand, 2012), which is a graphical user
               interface for R (version 2.13.0; The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) .
                                                                                             [15]

               The characteristics of both groups were compared using the chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U tests. The
               postoperative survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and compared with the log-rank
               test. Significance was established at P < 0.05. As the number of patients older than 75 years are low, the
               sample size of the present study was small. Therefore, we used non-parametric statistical methods.


               RESULTS
               Patient characteristics
               Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. There were 20 patients in the LDG group and 40 in the ODG
               group with mean ages of 81.0 ± 5.0 and 81.4 ± 3.9 years, respectively. No significant differences were
               observed in terms of sex, BMI, ASA classification, previous surgery, or CCI. Since decreased respiratory
               function is a major risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications in the elderly, previous studies
               commonly assessed the predicted functional expiratory volume in 1 s, predicted vital capacity, or arterial
               oxygen saturation [16,17] . In this study, we used the Hugh-Jones classification to assess respiratory function ,
                                                                                                       [18]
               and no differences were observed between the two groups. The prevalence of comorbidity was high in both
               groups; only 25.0% of the patients in the LDG group (n = 5) and 15.0% of those in the ODG group (n = 6)
               had no preoperative comorbidity (CCI = 0).

               The surgical procedure and early surgical outcomes are summarized in Table 2. A Billroth I anastomosis
               was performed in 12 patients in the LDG group and in 18 in the ODG group, while a Roux-en-Y
               anastomosis was performed in 8 and 20 patients, respectively. The remaining patients in the ODG group
               underwent a Billroth II anastomosis. There were no conversions to open surgery in the LDG group. D2
               lymph node dissection was performed in 15 patients in the LDG group and in 26 patients in the ODG
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66