Page 109 - Read Online
P. 109

Mazzola et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2019;3:12  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2019.05                                    Page 7 of 10


                                                 Table 2. Intraoperative outcomes
                                      Duration of surgery (min)*            369 (275-440)
                                      Type of anastomosis:
                                       HDS technique with transorally inserted anvil  1
                                       S-S overlap anastomosis                  5
                                       E-S anastomosis                          4
                                      Intraoperative complication               1
                                      Associated procedures                     6
                                      Conversion to open surgery                1
               Data is expressed as number of patients. *Data is expressed as an average with range in brackets. HDS: hemi-double-stapling; S-S: side-
               to-side; E-S: end-to-side


                                                 Table 3. Postoperative outcomes
                                      Length of hospital stay (day)*      10 (8-58)
                                      Overall complications               7
                                      Severe complications                3
                                      Reoperations                        2
                                      Anastomotic leakage                 1
                                      Anastomotic stenosis                0
                                      Abdominal abscess                   1
                                      POPF                                0
                                      Duodenal stump leak                 0
                                      Wound infection                     0
                                      Ileus caused by internal hernia     1
                                      Number of LNs harvested §           29 (15-38)
                                      Number of LNs positive §            5 (0-22)
                                      Tumor dimension (mm)                49 (17-130)
                                      Pathological T1b/T2/T3/T4a #        1/1/6/2
                                      Pathological N0/N1/N2/N3a/N3b       3/1/1/4/1
                                      Pathological stagingIb/IIa/IIIa/IIIb/IIIc #  2/2/1/4/1

                                      Median OS* (months)                 15.5 (6-32)
                                      Median DFS* (months)                12.5 (6-28)
                                                                                    §
               Data is expressed as number of patients. *Continuous variables are reported as mean values and range;  data is expressed as an average
               with range in brackets; #clinical staging according AJCC 8th Edition. POPF: postoperative pancreatic fistula; LNs: lymph-nodes; OS:
               overall survival; DFS: disease free survival

               Some critical aspects of this procedure however still make it open to debate, one of these being the
               possibility to perform a correct lymphadenectomy, especially to dissect the station 10. A large meta-
               analysis, comparing open and laparoscopic total gastrectomy, reported no statistical differences between
               the two techniques in terms of lymph-nodes clearance, 5-year OS and DFS, and free proximal resection
                                                                        [5]
               margins, confirming their same oncological safety and adequacy . This data was confirmed by another
               meta-analysis, including totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy only, reporting no difference in the number
                                         [21]
                                                                    [22]
               of the harvested lymph-nodes . Furthermore a recent RCT  reported an incidence of positive lymph-
               nodes in the station 10 of 2.4%, in a cohort of well selected patients, all candidates to total gastrectomy,
               concluding that, for these kind of patients, the station 10 lymphadenectomy is not mandatory; however
               in case of macroscopic lymph-nodes at splenic hilum it seems possible to perform a laparoscopic spleen-
                                  [23]
               preserving dissection . Our small series confirmed this data with a mean number of lymph-nodes
               harvested of 29; D2 lymphadenectomy and complete omentectomy were always performed in all the
               patients and they didn’t cause intraoperative nor postoperative complications; 2 patients needed, in
               addition, the spleen-preserving lymphadenectomy of the station 10 for slightly enlarged, suspicious, lymph-
               nodes without further morbidity.

               Therefore the major concern of laparoscopic total gastrectomy seems related to the E-J reconstruction. The
               first attempt to overcome this obstacle was to perform a midline mini-laparotomy for a hybrid approach;
   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114